User talk:Sanatandharmaway

November 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vedanta without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Aranya (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vedanta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  18:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bochasanwasi Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Moksha88 (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC) -- How is this disruptive? What was wrong with the content? --Sanatandharmaway (talk) 03:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Sanatandharmaway, your edit was disruptive because it is completely unsourced while not adhering to NPOV. Continuing to make edits this way will result in a ban, so please take some time to familiarize yourself with the policies (link above). Moksha88 (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Apollo1203. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Swaminarayan Sampradaya have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Apollo1203 (talk) 04:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Bochasanwasi Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Moksha88 (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Fake greedy sects of hindustan.
Thugs of hindustan laxmikant (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)