User talk:Sancar27/China Africa Research Initiative/Username89713 Peer Review

The most important thing for the author to do is make sure their information is organized appropriately. The way information is presented in a line of reasoning can strengthen an argument or deter from its purpose. I think the author should focus on thinking about the way they present their information logically - explain the methods, environmental impacts, then conclude with a political note. I thought this article provided a lot of detail in expanding on the environmental impacts of coral reef poaching. The author provided ample examples of what the environment goes through in consequence of coral poaching. However, the article seems to be lacking in political issues and expanding on which cultures or political actors are involved in coral poaching, good and bad. Tanzanian coastline is categorized under political issues but it doesn't elaborate on the political repercussions of fossilized limestone. The section just goes further into the environmental effects. I noticed that there seemed to be a lot more focus on environmental impacts than political issues.