User talk:Sanchez.Rigoberto/sandbox

"Article Evaluation"

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

1. Everything that dealt with the article was published. It went beyond the typical background of the plot and went on to describe the actor's feelings towards the movie; the response to criticism was also a great add on.

2. All information/citations are based a year before and after along with the year the film was released.

3. The film is greatly criticized and barely holds on to remain in a neutral standpoint. It remains true to statistics on ratings and it stays consistent to attempt to appeal to the general public. This however, should not be the case due to Snyder's view on his own DC universe. The general population is not knowledgeable on how dark DC comics is. This becomes increasingly difficult to argue his ratings due to the attempt to appeal to the general public.

4. Going through several citations, they tend to be quick quotes from the articles. Many of the articles are up to date and do check out from many credible sources. These articles check out as non-bias sources that do reflect true statements that are referenced in the article.

5. Continuous editing on whether information is relevant. Many argued whether most of the editing was done to refute the actual take on how the film did overall.

6. WikiProject Chicago / WikiProject Film / WikiProject Comics

(--Sanchez.Rigoberto (talk) 01:43, 8 September 2018 (UTC))