User talk:SandipaniDigital

Your recent editing of the article Ramesh Oza

 * 1) A Wikipedia article should be written from a neutral point of view, and must not be promotional. Your editing was clearly written with the intention of promoting a positive view of Ramesh Oza, which is not acceptable.
 * 2) Content of a Wikipedia article should be supported by references to reliable sources for that content. Your editing not only didn't provide references for the material which you added, but it also removed existing references.
 * 3) It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. It seems very unlikely that the publishers of the material which you plagiarised have given permission for their work to be freely reused with changes made to make it refer to a different person. JBW (talk) 09:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)