User talk:Sandmoi

Welcome
All jaat gurjar are brother

Yaa Sandmoi ([[User talk:Sandmoi#top|tal

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rajasthan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Arjun Rampal. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Arjun Rampal, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Arjun Rampal. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arjun Rampal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jat Sikh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haryana, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Unsourced and castes should not be mentioned in the lead of state or settlement articles. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sikhs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NitinMlk (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

You're engaging in edit-war behavior
''Here you have removed sourced material without explanation, for the second time. Please read WP:Edit war to familiarize yourself with why that's not a good idea. Removing sourced, factual material from any article requires a rather lengthy discussion, which you have yet to start.'' Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020: Repeating your old bad editing habits
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. --Quisqualis (talk) 07:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring as an IP
Worse yet, you are warring to remove sourced content You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Western Uttar Pradesh, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Interesting Geek (talk) 15:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)