User talk:Sandover

PLEASE NOTE: I delete old talk.

autism and Cho
The Korean word for autism 자폐증 (japyejeung) is a cognate of the Chinese/Japanese term 自閉症 (zibizheng), whose Chinese characters literally just mean "self-closed-syndrome" and can be colloquially applied to anyone who is introverted or noticeably quiet. It is not a very scientifically precise term and its typical usage would be equivalent to describing someone as "depressed" (saying "I am depressed" doesn't imply I have clinical depression). Thus the statement from Cho's grandmother of Cho being "autistic" must be taken with a huge grain of salt. I agree with you, I don't believe Cho was autistic. The media took a translated soundbite of "autism" and made a big deal out of it. --Naus 22:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

selective mutism and Cho
I remember the all the antagonism that was generated on the Cho talkpage last April when you first raised the selective mutism theory. I find it very interesting that, since then, it has emerged that Cho was indeed given this diagnosis as a junior high school student. 172.166.2.184 (talk) 00:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)kenmore


 * It is to the community's credit that it tolerated my tenacious and sometimes strong-armed editing in the wake of the Virginia Tech tragedy. I never met Cho, and had no inside knowledge of his selective mutism diagnosis. When I heard the 'autism' notion I thought it highly unlikely, given the videotape of Cho's speech patterns as broadcast by NBC two days after the terrible event. When Cho did speak, his voice lacked an autistic cadence.


 * The specific behavioral descriptions offered by Cho's Korean relatives, who met him twice during his childhood, were consistent with selective mutism, not with autism. In Cho's biography, I noted a behavioral hallmark of selective mutism: Cho had a single junior high school friend with whom he could speak and confide. That 'single special friend' comes up often among those who are selectively mute, but it is not at all typical of individuals with autism.


 * The first 'Cho was autistic' edit on Wikipedia appeared on April 20, 2007, sourced to English and Australian newspaper reports. Cho's dubious 'autism diagnosis' survived only 27 hours before I began chipping away at it on April 21st. By April 23rd, I had opened the possibility of selective mutism in both Cho's Wikipedia entry and in the Virginia Tech narrative, and continued to defend my edits and viewpoint aggressively for days. Acceptable compromise language was found for both articles, lasting until the Wall Street Journal confirmed Cho's selective mutism diagnosis (nearly four months later) on August 20, 2007. I updated Wikipedia with that news.


 * Kudos to those families who are now talking about selective mutism, and to the media who are now giving it such sensitive coverage. May we have more of this, please? Sandover (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swarts Ruin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

FP delisting nomination
Hi Sandover, I've nominated a picture you successfully nominated for FP in 2005 for delisting (of its FP status) here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Kyoto_Fushimi_Inari_shrine Feel free to contribute to the discussion. JPNEX (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:McPheeBradley.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:McPheeBradley.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hans Lodeizen
Thanks for getting this started--I was reminded to look him up after reading a few of his poem's in Komrij's anthology. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malibu Ozarks


The article Malibu Ozarks has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "As per WP:NOTNEO and WP:OR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 18:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

File:KyotoFushimiInariLarge.jpg nominated for delisting
Please see. MER-C 10:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Latesettings.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Latesettings.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)