User talk:SandraSmithEditor

March 2021
Hello, I'm .JackintheBox I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Her (dating app)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 11:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Her (dating app). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

If everyone will join wikipedia to promote his App you will use wikipedia resources for promoting people Apps!! The user:Janemo123 that created the page joined wikipedia just to create this page and he never edited anything else, also there is no single realible Source, and the user:Jackinthebox trying to support this promotion page, I suggest look at the user:Jackinthebox pages too!! WIKIPEDIA IS NIT FOR PROMOTING APPS! SandraSmithEditor (talk) 12:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Her (dating app) is not eligible for speedy deletion, as it clearly meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Your attempts to keep re-listing the article for deletion appear to be disruptive; please stop. -- The Anome (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your endless re-nomination of that article for speedy deletion is now clearly disruptive. Please stop, or you will be blocked from editing. -- The Anome (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The Anome JackintheBox Show me a single realible source man Are you corrupted person?

Shoe me a realible source corruoted person I will never stop unless you show me a realible source Because you waste wikipedia resources on promoting Dating Apps!! SandraSmithEditor (talk) 12:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for disruptive editing. You are welcome to make positive contributions when the block expires; however, persistent disruptive editing is likely to result in longer blocks or permanent blocking. -- The Anome (talk) 12:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)