User talk:Sandrob57

Unspecified source for Image:Lunar_wars_banner.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lunar_wars_banner.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk  03:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Just delete it, the page it was linked to got erased.

A tag has been placed on Thread (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  06:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Sharing information is a good thing, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of random information. There are literally hundreds of people writing articles about bands, and not all are considered notable enough for inclusion.  The general consensus among editors about where to draw the line can be found here.  Thank you for your contribution, and I hope you will continue to add to the information here.  -- Finngall   talk  06:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

PHP-Fusion
A template has been added to the article PHP-Fusion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Jackaranga 12:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Ethiopia
Please read WP:ERA. Wikipedia's policies on era systems and era changes allow either BCE/CE or BC/AD in articles. This applies to any article; established era systems should only be changed if the change is agreed through talk-page consensus. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 23:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's pretty stupid, but I guess if that's the rule that's the rule. My apologies that my skewed assumption of what neutrality is doesn't coincide with Wikipedia's. It's good to know that "Before Christ" and a latin phrase meaning "In The Year of the Lord" is the most neutral way of specifying a date. Sandrob57 (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)