User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2023/September

Request to Restore Deletion of M. D. Parashar Wikipedia Page
Dear Sandstein,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request your assistance regarding the deletion of the Wikipedia page for M. D. Parashar, which was deleted on April 7, 2021. I recently discovered that the page was deleted, and I believe that there may have been a misunderstanding regarding its notability.

M. D. Parashar was my father, and I would like to see his Wikipedia page restored if possible. I have gathered additional reliable sources and references that establish his notability in his field of work, and I believe that the page can be improved to meet Wikipedia's guidelines.

I kindly request that you consider reviewing the situation and, if appropriate, guide me on the process of restoring the article or creating a new one that aligns with Wikipedia's standards. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and am committed to providing verifiable and reliable information.

I greatly appreciate your time and assistance in this matter. Please let me know how I can proceed or if there are any specific steps you recommend taking.

Thank you for your attention to this request.

Sincerely,

Ayush.parashar27 Ayush.parashar27 (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi - please follow WP:THREE.  Sandstein   12:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Please Restore Wanda Phipps Page
Hello:

Could you please restore this page for this writer/translator: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanda Phipps? Perditarp (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * No, because you neither provide a reason to nor a link.  Sandstein   16:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of gacha games for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of gacha games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of gacha games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. QuietCicada (talk) 13:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Sandstein, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  08:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)