User talk:Sandugab

Nomination of ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- samtar whisper 12:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- samtar whisper 12:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad. -- samtar whisper 12:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad has been reverted. Your edit here to ”Ioan Popescu” Pedagogical High School Barlad was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://licped.blogspot.ro/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: InstaGrok (January 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:InstaGrok and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:InstaGrok Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:InstaGrok reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  04:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent articles
Hello. I'm a new page reviewer and I hate pouncing on new articles just after they're born. But I can't see how your articles on  Tribuna pedagogică and Îndrumări pedagogice meet our notability criteria. You might like to read Notability (academic journals) and quickly insert some independent sources that demonstrate how these journals meet them before some other reviewer proposes them for deletion. I realise that can be a soul-destroying thing to happen, so I wanted to give you a 'heads up' on my concerns. Similarly, you could also do with finding some more sources to support Solomon Haliţă, too. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Îndrumări pedagogice


The article Îndrumări pedagogice has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable magazine, no evidence that this meets WP: NMAG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CataracticPlanets (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tribuna pedagogică


The article Tribuna pedagogică has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable magazine, no evidence that this meets WP:NMAG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CataracticPlanets (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Solomon Haliță moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Solomon Haliță, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)