User talk:SandyBMW

Single purpose accounts
The seven user/IPs on this list have been primarily or exclusively single-purpose accounts used for editing only one article, Aaron Klein. More than one editor is quite certain that all of these accounts have been and/or are used by the subject himself.


 * SandyBMW (Talk) (contribs) (January 2007)
 * 89.1.187.177 (talk) (contribs) (November-December 2006)
 * MikeJason (talk) (contribs) (November-December 2006)
 * 89.1.187.215 (talk) (contribs) (August-November 2006)
 * Joshua1988 (talk) (contribs) (September 2006)
 * 192.118.11.112 (talk) (contribs) (March-December 2006)
 * Jerusalem21 (talk) (contribs) (March 2006) (Wrote first version)

Every image ever placed in the article has been uploaded by one or more of these user/IPs. Every such image has been obtained from World Net Daily. All have persistently added add far more external links to that single site than Wikipedia consensus deems appropriate.

All of these user/IPs have repeatedly violated key Wikipedia policies and Wikipedia guidelines, several of which are here referenced in two excerpts:

Conflict of interest
A Wikipedia conflict of interest is an incompatibility between the purpose of Wikipedia to produce a neutral encyclopedia and the individual agendas or aims of editors who are involved with the subject of an article. This includes promotion of oneself or other individuals, causes, organizations, and companies you work for, and their products, as well as suppression of negative information, and criticism of competitors. If you have a conflict of interest, you should:
 * 1) avoid editing articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 2) avoid breaching relevant policies on autobiographies and neutrality
 * 3) avoid participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 4) avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your corporation in other articles (see Spam).
 * ↑ Excerpted from Conflict of interest.

Disruptive editing
This guideline concerns gross, obvious and repeated violations of fundamental policies, not subtle questions about which reasonable people may disagree. A disruptive editor is an editor who: In addition, such editors may:
 * Is tendentious: continues editing an article or group of articles in pursuit of a certain point for an extended time despite opposition from one or more other editors.
 * Rejects community input: resists moderation and/or requests for comment, continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors and/or administrators.
 * Campaign to drive away productive contributors: violate other policies and guidelines such as Civility, No personal attacks, Ownership of articles, engage in sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry, etc. on a low level that might not exhaust the general community's patience, but that operates toward an end of exhausting the patience of productive rules-abiding editors on certain articles.
 * ↑ Excerpted from Disruptive editing.

Additional sockpuppet
See also Sock puppetry 13:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 192.118.11.120 (talk) (contribs) (January 2007)

Questions
→  See also: Single purpose account.

If you have questions about these policies and how they pertain to your edits, please post them on the article talk page, Talk:Aaron Klein. — Athænara  ✉  19:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)