User talk:Sandymark11

February 2022
Hello, I'm GoldMiner24. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Times Internet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GoldMiner24 (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to OpIndia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SN54129 14:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Over-the-top media services in India, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · c) 17:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring and sockpuppetry?
If you are the same person as User:Dangusim, then please understand that editing under multiple accounts is frowned upon and doing so in order to engage in edit warring (in particular, at "") is a serious violation of Wikipedia rules that may lead to you getting permanently banned. - dcljr (talk) 02:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

My account issue 5 to 6 days ago, and who is the dangusim?. I see the edit history and which is correct, I edit that Dangusim (talk) 06:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

5 to 6 month ago 123 something edit in my account Dangusim (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Which dangusim account, are you talking? There are only one account Dangusim. Dangusim (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sid95Q (talk) 22:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alert
—  Newslinger  talk   14:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

OpIndia
WP:RSNP says "Due to persistent abuse, OpIndia is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used. OpIndia is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. OpIndia was rejected by the International Fact-Checking Network when it applied for accreditation in 2019. In the 2020 discussion, most editors expressed support for deprecating OpIndia. Editors consider the site biased or opinionated. OpIndia has directly attacked and doxed Wikipedia editors who edit India-related articles. Posting or linking to another editor's personal information is prohibited under the outing policy, unless the editor is voluntarily disclosing the information on Wikipedia. Editors who are subject to legal risks due to their activity on Wikipedia may request assistance from the Wikimedia Foundation, although support is not guaranteed. See also: Swarajya."

Another edit like that one will get you at least topic banned. Doug Weller talk 14:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Also, this edit added broken English to the article, besides being disruptive in several ways. So did this (it's not actually easier to understand because it adds a lot of inappropriate capital letters). Please consider contributing to the Wikipedia in your native language instead. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC).

Edit-warring at Over-the-top media services in India
You appear to be edit-warring at Over-the-top media services in India. Please stop, discuss the issues raised at the article talk page, and establish consensus for your proposed edits before further editing the article. Your current approach will just lead you to being blocked. Abecedare (talk) 18:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Page block from Over-the-top media services in India
You have been blocked from the article Over-the-top media services in India for a month for repeatedly adding text based on an unreliable source with user-generated content, www.legalserviceindia.com; for claiming that source says something it doesn't; and for poor English. (I see you did not choose to reply to my post about your English proficiency above.) Please note that you are not blocked from the article's talkpage, where you can still discuss issues and attempt to form a consensus for the changes you wish to make. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; tålk 20:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC).

I read recently wiki section about attributable, reliable published sources, sources that are usually not reliable, biographies of living persons, And Wikipedia three core content policies Neutral point of view(NPOV) Verifiablity(V) No original Research (NOR) This will be very helpful to my Wikipedia journey and Wikipedia contributions. And Thanks for Explaining my mistakes in a very Simply way. Sandymark11 (talk) 20:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Mauryabhi7715&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Mauryabhi7715&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)