User talk:SaneSerenity

SaneSerenity.

Thank you for your input. Please explain the edit of evolution vs creationism.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.224.245 (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style Also, make test edits in the sandbox I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ). If you need help, please see our help pages.--WelcomeMachine 10:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''While I understand the the section you deleted lacked references, it appears (upon looking at the Edward Irving page) that it contains valid information. Maybe it could be improved, rather than deleted. '' Agathman (talk) 14:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Reformed Apostolic Church


The article Reformed Apostolic Church has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources or claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova 314 04:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Old Apostolic Church, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Can I forward you the Source Document for verification? SaneSerenity (talk)

April 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Old Apostolic Church. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss the issues on the article's talk page. Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Old Apostolic Church. Jim1138 (talk) 04:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Can I forward you the Source Document. SaneSerenity (talk) Sane Serenity


 * Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. If you continue without doing so, you will be blocked from editing. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 05:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Reformed Apostolic Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reformed Apostolic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reformed Apostolic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Veverve (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Reformed Old Apostolic Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reformed Old Apostolic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reformed Old Apostolic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Veverve (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)