User talk:Sanfranman59/Archive 1

Chuck Knipp
The same user (74.140.207.83) keeps vandalizing the page over and over. Could we please have a semilocked page?

Projects
I've enjoyed Wikipedia as a non-registered user for quite a while, but have decided to get involved in some of the Wiki projects. I've started with the Dead External Links project and have already spent a good bit of time working on that. Other than reading about the project and following the guidelines, is there a standard protocol to use when I start working on a project? For example, should I notify someone that I'm working on it? If so, who should I notify?
 * Read the guidelines for your WikiProject. I doubt it though because anyone can edit pretty much any page at will, so there's really no point in notifying anyone anywhere, unless you want to iron out differences or collaborate otherwise. Xiner (talk, email) 20:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Just a heads up...
Hello! I just wanted to let you know that Dl-s, unlike other dead link templates, goes after the dead link, not in place of it. Happy editing!  Iced Kola(Mmm...) 18:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You can use any of the dead external link templates to mark a link as dead. However, when a dead link is in a paragraph, it is recomended that you use { {dlw-inline|url= Insert Dead Url here |title= caption }} in place of the dead link, or  { {dl-s| Insert Dead URL here }} after the dead link.  Iced Kola(Mmm...) 20:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Bot request
I left you a note at the bot request page. Just wanted to call your attention to it --Selket Talk 01:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Pitchfork Media rating templates
Hello, having the 10 stars for a website that includes decimals within their ratings is pointless, a more explicit display of the rating is much better in the case of Pitchfork Media reviews


 * Why do you think the 10-star ratings are pointless and what do you mean by "a more explicit display of the rating"? Do you mean like "(8/10)"? I see the star displays as a good visual snapshot of what the reviewer thinks of the album. If I want more details, I can click on the link and go read the review. Otoh, I just read the guidelines on the Album Project page more carefully and it seems to say not to use the Rating-10 template. DOH! Sanfranman59 22:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't be too discouraged. I wouldn't have thought twice about doing the same thing myself, and I've been around for a while.  Jkelly 00:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I guess I'd best stick to simply fixing broken links for now until I more fully digest the Album Project guidelines. One of the things that I'm discovering as I become more active in the Wikipedia community is that it's difficult to know when someone is speaking from authority or experience. For example, how do I know how much stock to put in Folajimi's comments (or yours, for that matter)? Sanfranman59 00:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You can come up with a rough guess by looking at the age of the account. Click on "User contributions", and then click on "Oldest".  While this, obviously, isn't going to always give a perfect picture of whether someone knows what they're talking about or not, it can be better than nothing.  Jkelly 01:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggestion. I've spent the last hour or so looking back through the discussion pages at WikiProject_Albums and, perhaps not surprisingly, this can of worms has been open for quite some time. From my read of it, the consensus of the relatively few people (maybe 10 or so) who have discussed this topic is that unless the source specifically uses stars in grading its reviews, the star templates should not be used. Much of the discussion has been around whether to ever use the star templates, even when the source does so. As best as I can determine, no consensus has been reached, but I'm still reading. As much as I hate the thought of doing it, I think I'm going to go back through all the articles I've modified over the past week or so and get rid of the stars for those sources that don't use a star system. Live and learn! Sanfranman59 01:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Response to message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Players
The markup listed on the template page contains a lot of parameters that are rarely used, and lacks some that are common. If you browse around current player bios, you'll notice the infoboxes contain pretty much the same information: team, uniform number, primary position, hitting and throwing hand, debut info, three stat fields, and former teams. Here's what I use. Hopefully nobody will mind my clogging up this page with it.

I put some place holders in, so you could see what's normally linked and what is not. A note about stats: use your discretion about which ones to include. If the above box were for Scott Podsednik, stolen bases would give a better idea of what he does than homerun. Batting average and ERA are pretty standard, but feel free to adapt the rest.

As for career stat charts, they're generally frowned upon and will probably be deleted. I've removed plenty myself. The best idea is to include a links to baseball reference, under the "External links" header. Luckily, there's a template for this too:



Every baseball reference player page has an id at the end of the URL. The one above links to Placido Polanco. Paste the template with the corresponding id into an article, and you get this:

Hope I was able to help. We always need more editors willing to do mundane tasks like adding infoboxes. If you have any more questions, feel free to leave another message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Players, or on my talk page. --Djrobgordon 07:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * In response to your question about who is worthy of an article, WP:BIO says that anyone who's played in a "fully professional league" can have an article, but in practice most editors set the standard a little higher. Top prospects and players likely to make the majors, such as Alex Gordon and Cameron Maybin, but your energy could probably be better spent improving an existing article than adding a stub on a AAA lifer.  That's just my opinion, though.


 * I generally don't add infoboxes to players who haven't played in the majors, since the presence of the infobox implies that they have, but again, that's just my personal rule. I have seen the boxes with minor league stats in them.  I don't remember how the editor noted that they were minor league stats.  If a player has appeared in the majors even once, use his Major League stats.


 * Hope that helped. --Djrobgordon 03:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Proceed with no worries
I look at Tribe players from time to time, but I am making no sort of concerted effort. I just have my mind on a player and check his Wikipedia page. Right now I am noticing an effort on C.C. Sabathia to introduce irrelevancies / inaccuracies about his weight. At any rate, go ahead with your program and I'll try not to step on your toes. LightningMan 15:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Cleveland Indians
Hello, Sanfranman59! I'm not a big Wiki user and know next to nothing about the code. I'm a big Tribe fan and just make sure the player articles are kept up to date/relevant/accurate. You won't be stepping on my toes in any way to keep doing what you're doing. It's great to have another fan aboard! Tytrain 00:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I took a look at the changes you made to the Matt Miller article and love them. Now, about Boof Bonser. I'll make this short. In 2001, I opened a pack of baseball cards and got a Boof Bonser RC. I almost died laughing. I've been tracking his career in detail ever since. You have no idea how surreal it is to have my obscure, hopeless minor leaguer actually make it to the majors and be the #2 guy on the Twins. When Boof was traded to the Twins I danced for joy - he was in the same division as the Tribe. Sure enough, I got to watch his start in Cleveland last year. Tytrain 00:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I rated your changes to the Jeremy Sowers article. I am new to rating articles, and yours is a start class at worst. Since I'm new to rating, I didn't want to give it a B rating unless someone else agrees with me. Tytrain 21:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Honestly, as I read the criteria for a B-class article, I think Sowers is there already. I just started rating articles, and I don't want to over-rate one. I think it's B-class, and if you can get another user to agree, I think it can safely be upgraded. One tiny thing - the lead-in could use something about Sowers now - in his first full season, etc., to establish that he's a noteworthy Indian and not, say, filling in for another injured starter or something. Tytrain 13:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, I'd appreciate it if you would pop in over at the talk page for the 2007 Indians season article. I want to know what people think about calling them "Tribe" on occasion. And, if you'd like to, it'd be great to have another contributor to the article itself! Tytrain 00:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 07:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Helpme request: NPOV tag
Is there some protocol that I'm supposed to follow before removing an tag from an article? I've been working on sourcing Blood on the Tracks. First of all, I'm not sure that it was appropriately tagged in the first place as there is no discussion on the article Talk page (unless it's because the first 3 paragraphs are a quote from a Salon.com article). The tag was added by an anonymous user back in October (diff link) and it's the only contribution from this IP address. The only clue as to the reason for the tag is in the edit summary: 'NPOV warning: "an ineffable moment in his most vulnerable song" etc'. But since the quote comes directly from the Salon article, it doesn't seem to me to be non-NPOV. The original editor didn't reference the source. Now that I have added the reference, is it legit to remove the tag and the NPOV disputes category? If not, what's the process? Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. Sanfranman59 00:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you do not see any problem or think that you have resolved the problem, feel free to remove the tag. In general keep in mind that many of these taggings do not have and do not need an explanation on the talk page: POV and other issues are often self-evident, and the tagger might explain in the edit summary. Obviously, if someone replaces the tag or brings the issue up on the talk page, discuss there. As with most everything on Wikipedia, do what you think is appropriate for an encyclopedia. There are a scattering of crazy people of various sorts, but in general: the person who tagged an article thought there was a problem, though the tagger might have been mistaken or have done it hastily or might be himself biased, and the same is true of what you're doing.
 * For this section in particular, the person probably thought the "The songs" section was unbalanced or did not accurately reflect the totality of reviews. These sorts of sections are especially difficult because we cannot simply completely include all the opinions of every reviewer, and it is sometimes difficult to decide the relative merit or reliability of different reviewers and publications, and even if you think you have it rather objectively right, someone will come along who loved or hated the song who cites a handful of apparently perfectly reliable reviews that support the position, etc. —Centrx→talk &bull; 00:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Extraordinary Machine
Many non-U.S. readers read dates as dd/mm/yy, not mm/dd/yy. Please do not write dates in either format because it can create confusion. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 21:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC).

VF query
Hi, I've posted a response on the talk page here. Zarius 16:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Also I've recently added a VF topic here. - RoyBoy 800 01:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Baseball statistic updates
I'm not sure if there's ever been a discussion about how frequently to update stats, but I'm pretty sure that if you posed the question to WikiProject Baseball almost everyone would agree with you. I don't remember where, but buried in some piece of policy is the point that Wikipedia articles generally don't contain information that changes on a day to day basis. This always happens at the start of the season, and most of the editors don't keep it up. If the editor doesn't respond to your message, I'd just change it back. If it becomes an issue, leave a message on the Project talk page and I think you'll find the consensus is in your favor.--Djrobgordon 21:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Paul Byrd
I've added my comments, but don't feel strongly and suggest that we wait until someone else has an opinion, and go along with that either way. By the way, this is how you link to a talk page. Matchups 17:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Ages in infoboxes for baseball players
SFM59, check out my solution at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball/Players and have a look at Ron Mahay to see how it looks in application. Let me know if you have any suggestions or can figure out how to eliminate that blank row. Caknuck 04:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

San Diego Padres Roster
Please could you add a suitable introduction to this article. Or merge it with the parent one. As it stands, it is non-encyclopaedic and does not meet WP guidelines. Thanks Gillyweed 05:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Standardized Rosters
Love it! Any kind of standardization is a plus, if you ask me. You have my support! Kntrabssi 06:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: Standardized rosters
Actually, the only edits I made were moving the pages to reflect the standard title format for the pages. Aside from that, I haven't to my own knowledge made any other changes to rosters. The rosters are not something that I really am concerned with personally and don't pay a lof of attention to. Sorry I can't be of help to you. --Ksy92003 06:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is just an example, I can't recall the real instances. But there were some that were like "Template:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim roster", some like "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim roster", among other variations.  I moved what I could so the titles would follow the same format.  --Ksy92003 06:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine. When I did what I did, I didn't have an opinion, and I still don't.  The way that I moved them was simply the way that I could get mostly all of the roster "templates" the same title format with the fewest necessary page moves.  That's the only reason why I did it that way, not because of my opinion on which way it should be or whatever.  Do what you wish with it.  That's alright with me.  --Ksy92003 06:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Phil Stockman nationality
I had this explained to me on here before. This is what the other person wrote:

''Nationality is not determined on place of birth, but rather citizenship. Stockman has chosen Australian as his nationality (born to Aussie parents on Oldham), he played for the Aussie at the world baseball classic (etc.) Many examples of likewise situations, Neil Kilkenny, Ireland cricket team, Bob Woolmer, millions of others.''

He's right.Chris Nelson 16:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Haha it's cool, I did the same thing before he explained it to me.Chris Nelson 17:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Help with league and team article standardization
Hi! I saw you were participating in the roster standarization project (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball) and was wondering if you'd also be interested in helping me with a similar project for leagues and teams. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Archive 34 for more information. I haven't gotten any general response, so I'm soliciting individuals! Thanks in advance for your comments! --CPAScott 15:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

In response to your question about Vandal Fighter
Hi there. In response to your question about VF on the CVU talk page, you might want to try downgrading your VF to version 3.3 as it seems like some people have trouble with more recent versions. In general, version 3.5 is considered still in beta and could have bugs IIRC. Version 3.3 is relatively stable. I hope that helps you! --BloodDoll 17:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

SD Padres Roster -- Thanks
Shifting it to a template with an edit button directly from "San Diego Padres" was certainly the correct thing to do. Thanks. Can I expand the "e" to "edit" so it's more obvious to new editors how to modify the template? --Myke Cuthbert 02:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Template problems at Major League Baseball rosters
I figured out why some of the rosters weren't displaying at Major League Baseball rosters. Check out my explanation & solution here and let me know if I did right. Cheers, Caknuck 08:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello! I see your seeking adoption. If your still interested I'd me more then happy to answer your questions and help you out. You can respond back to this by leaving a message here. If you have decided that you no longer wish to be adopted, please remove the adoptee's userbox from your userpage. Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! Matthew Yeager 03:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

mets roster template comment on my talk page
i didn't put chan ho park onto Template:New York Mets roster, and i'm not responsible for him not being in alphabetical order. thanks for the hot shot comment on my talk page; you might want to check before you comment next time. 141.155.170.86 is responsible for that despicable edit. Riphamilton 05:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

RE: Owens as Closer
Well, today on the "Marlins On Deck" pregame show, Fredi Gonzales said that after he has given Owens the past few save situations he was going to put him in to keep closing games. I also saw later that the MLB.com depth chart designated him as the closer. He has been put in in the last 4 save situations (plus one 9th inning that got him a win). I felt this was enough to put him as closer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rabbethan (talk • contribs) 04:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Thanks for asking in the first place and not just editing it like some love to do. Rabbethan 08:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
If you're interested checkout my user page and my talk page to see if you'd like to be adopted. Sam ov the blue sand 00:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Roster moves
When teams make a roster move without a corresponding move, it's the other way around. Someone gets demoted or placed on the DL, then later another guy is added. There just shouldn't be 26 guys listed on the 25-man roster, and since you don't know who has been demoted or deactivated you can't avoid this. Therefore, Lerew should stay inactive until spot is cleared for him.Chris Nelson 06:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

baseball-reference template
I fixed it now. I had just added an extra space in my previous edit to the template. Thanks for letting me know. =) Nishkid64 (talk)  20:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

MLB Roster Infoboxes
Hell I'll change the ones I've edited myself if the template is changed. I'm all for it changing. But I don't like the idea of presenting wrong info, and that's what is happening with the way the current template is. There shouldn't be wrong info on articles just in case something might change in the future. I won't go looking for pages to change, but I'm also not going to change the ones I've done back.Chris Nelson 23:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Baseball player article naming conventions
Sorry, I got derailed by a few things at work, etc... I should have the draft copy available in my namespace sometime this week. I'll leave a msg here, as well as a note on the project pages when it's ready. If we can get consensus on the finalized language, I'll post the proposal to the WP namespace for final review. Caknuck 02:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As promised, I have posted the draft copy here. Please feel free to discuss/propose changes at the talk page for the draft copy. Thanks for your input so far! Caknuck 04:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicates
Hold on there a second, look at 1995. What do you see. A full season summary. Besides, I generally start articles that relate to each other, I start with basically the same texts. Don't worry, I'm going to do plenty of work to them. What you see for all the articles I do will just be the basic groundwork, although your help would be appreciated! Soxrock 00:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The reason is that that article is for baseball GLOBALLY, my article is specifically for Major League Baseball. That's why. Besides, like I said, I'm just laying out the foundations for those articles, I'm going to embark on adding stats and everything to them. Soxrock 01:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Soxrock
I don't see why this guy is doing all this information, which is basically 95% copied from the yyyy in baseball, then he also doesn't understand to change every single yyyy in baseball to yyyy MLB season, that it would take years of work to change everything back. I don't know why this guy is adding all these articles, but he's doing all of it for naught. MetsFan153 01:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Look, if that were the case, then why does it have to be 1995 in baseball for example. If it is essentially only MLB, then why is the other stuff there? Doesn't matter what you thing either Metfan, the articles are going to be expanded. Soxrock 01:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Somewhat. I want others opinions, but not the presumptous ones. I'd like to say that if you have a good opinion, then give it to me. But don't tell me that it is a waste of time when it's just getting started. Soxrock 01:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

It's necessary because that season template doesn't look good with all the red links. Besides, I'm starting to seem like a broken record, THESE ARE THE BEGINNINGS OF THE ARTICLES. THEY WILL BE EXPANDED! (unless I got unmotivated). Soxrock 01:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Category
Hello. It is only a guess by his surname which is Polish. Czech, e.g. would be "Borovský". - Darwinek 17:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Totally agree with you. P.S. Kutz is a German surname but many non-Germans also have this surname, e.g. Polish film director Kazimierz Kutz. As for the original surname you mentioned, Polish surname with diacritics would be Kuczyński. - Darwinek 19:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Joe Borowski
Never checked the history to see that there was a rv of that already, heh. By my knowledge, it's a very safe bet that if a name ends in "-ski", it's Polish. I have no source for it though, so you can re-rv if you must.-- Wizardman 22:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!!!
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and well articulated comments regarding the inclusion of external links. It is nice to be able to discuss the issue at hand. I will give some other people an opportunity to chime in before I add my thoughts. I think some good things can come out of this! // Tecmobowl 00:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

The Catholic Encyclopedia is public domain
I have just restored Konstantin von Höfler, which you hastily marked for speedy deletion. The Catholic Encyclopedia is public domain, being published by 1913. I think you should take the trouble to scroll down to where it said exactly that: This article incorporates text from the public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia of 1913. Charles Matthews 18:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fangraphs
This if fyi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#behavioral_problems_at_wikiproject_baseball:_Epeefleche.2C_Baseball_Bugs_and_Tecmobowl  --Epeefleche 01:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Adoption offer
Hey, I noticed that you were listed yourself as seeking adoption, so if you're still interested, I'd like to offer my services to you. I'm from the SF bay area too; I went to high school in the City and live in Oakland right now, so we already have some common ground! -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 21:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Jeremy Sowers Infobox
Hi. It was my understanding that the team and number listed at the top of the infobox should be the players current team and number, which is the Buffalo Bisons and a number to be determined shortly. Why did you change it back to Cleveland? He isn't at Cleveland anymore.69.68.238.142 17:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Casey Blake article
Hi Sanfranman- the "Casey Blake (baseball)" name is fine...I was debating which way to go myself. Cjs2111 03:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey again - just click the "move" tab (between history and watch) at the top of the article. Cjs2111 03:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Artistdirect reviews
Nice job on cleaning up the reviews! Regarding this change, note that WP:ALBUM lists Artistdirect as a review source for professional reviews. AFAICT some Artistdirect reviews are copies of All Music Guide reviews, some (like this one) are not. Perhaps we should stop recommending using reviews from Artistdirect, but it should probably be discussed first (preferably at WT:ALBUM). --PEJL 21:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure how carefully the entries at WP:ALBUM have been considered. I can see the argument for removing Artistdirect (and Buy.com) from that list. As for the star ratings, I've removed quite a number of those myself, so hopefully that will lighten your load a little. And I wish someone would tell Pitchfork that cool URIs don't change. --PEJL 23:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Milton Bradley
I understand your reasoning, but technically it's inaccurate. Bradley will never be on the extended roster for the Padres. With definite Major Leaguers that are traded like Bradley or Maroth, they will simply not be on the roster at all until they go to the 25-man roster. I was aware of the Thompson move, however that move is just a precursor to someone on the 25-man roster being DLed or optioned to the extended roster to make room for Bradley. Since Bradley will never be on the extended roster, it is inaccurate to put him there. We should just keep things accurate at all times, which in this case is to leave him completely off the template until someone from the 25-man roster is cleared and Bradley is added. I don't want to be confrontational about this though, you do a good job as well and I appreciate it. I hope you understand my point of view though. Later. ► Chris Nelson 01:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Ernest Lanigan
A copyright violation? Ya think? :) I didn't write it, it was already there. It also restates much of what's in the book's intro. You asked how the book is. Well, if you like the writing style of that time period, and if you don't mind reading about stuff you might already know about, it's worth a look. Keep in mind that it's mostly info that's been brought along and expanded in subsequent works, like the Sporting News record books, the Turkin and Thompson Encylopedias, the MacMillan encyclopedias, and later the Total Baseball series. I find it of interest largely for its historical value and the sometimes-pithy comments by the writer, such as pointing out when somebody else got some facts wrong. Baseball Bugs 03:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nor did I take it that you were implying I wrote it. :) With or without copyright violation, it's not properly structured, so I didn't want anyone thinking I had written something so poorly. One of my minor objectives would be to re-write it in such a way that it gives the facts without being a verbatim theft, and also to cite the book itself as the source, if I haven't done so already in the article.
 * I did some work on the article. Please give it a look. I'm sure it can use improvements, but it's better than it was. Many of the facts in it were stated twice, for one thing. I tried to put it into something resembling chronological order. Baseball Bugs 04:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I made some more changes. I'm still not altogether happy with it. For one thing, it's too long. But it's slowly getting better. Baseball Bugs 00:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your compliments. I think I do OK with syntax. My writing style is not exactly in Hemingway's league. So I welcome improvements. :) Baseball Bugs 00:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

A's rotation
Half assumed, half because the depth chart still says it on the website and I figured it only made sense he'd go back. We can change it if you aren't comfortable with it though.► Chris Nelson  19:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Well if they went with Lewis I think Geren would have to be committed.► Chris Nelson  19:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Milledge
Wow you just beat me too that one, I was editing and clicked save but your edit is the one that showed up, haha. Anyway, I was just curious where you got the Milledge half of the transaction. I'm not doubting you, I just haven't seen that part and I was wondering your source.► Chris Nelson  20:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Tanyon Sturtze's #
Just letting you know now since you are the person who edits MLB rosters as much as I do. Although Sturtze is listed at 37 on the Braves' roster, I'm sure you are aware that Jo-Jo Reyes is also wearing that number on the active roster. While we normally keep extended roster guys with their listed numbers even if it's a duplicate, I've confirmed that Sturtze is wearing 34 now. I am a die-hard hometown Braves fan, and in tonight's game against Pittsburgh I caught a glimpse of Sturtze in the dugout after an Andruw home run. He was indeed wearing 34. So just letting you know that I've confirmed this and that the MLB.com roster is wrong.► Chris Nelson  02:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Jason Michaels
Hey. To get it to GA status, I'd say try and make sure there's no one-sentence paragraph, and double check to make sure everything flows nicely. Expand where you can as well. It's not too far from it, so you can try it at WP:GAC if you wish. (I thought i responded to this, sorry it took a while) Wizardman  20:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Lohse
My bad on Lohse's number, I didn't intentionally put it there, but rather I copied him from the Reds' roster while deleting him there and forgot to blank out his number. Thanks for fixing it.► Chris Nelson  00:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah I'm very happy with it. I love Salty and think he'll be good, but he's not very good defensively at first and Teixeira is obviously more proven. And Andrus has a lot of potential now too, but obviously he's got a ways to go. I've also heard we're trying to get Bronson Arroyo and Octavio Dotel, and if Schuerholz could do that without giving up Yunel Escobar the man is a god. I'm just hoping the Oswalt-to-Mets talk is dead, that rotation would kill us.► Chris Nelson  01:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

My bad on Startup. I swear when I made that edit he was there, but it was probably a mistake on their part after the trade. I should have been skeptical though.► Chris Nelson  18:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Moseley and Santana
Re your message: True. I've reverted it back. The past double header really messed things up, I think. -- Gogo Dodo 06:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

WP meetup
-- phoebe/ (talk) 06:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Bad VP, no biscuit
I don't use VP regularly, so I can't advise how to fix the mis-addressed warnings issue. (Personally, I watch new-editor changes and eyeball changes, or else I use Vandal Fighter but do the warnings manually.) No harm, no foul (and thank you for catching it and reverting it away). —C.Fred (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

It's OK on the mistaken VandalProof error you posted on my page and cleaned up. This is a known new bug that has been discussed at User_talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs. In the meantime, and until it is fixed, I use VP as an browser, doing manual edits as I have been burned by this too. Let them know you also have this problem. Happy wiking and go chase the vandals! Alexf (Talk/Contribs) 01:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)