User talk:Sangeetratnakar

Speedy deletion nomination of Hom Nath Upadhyaya


A tag has been placed on Hom Nath Upadhyaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20160728025050/http://homnathtabla.com/biography.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nick Carter (singer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Meters. I had referenced CNN as the source for the material I added. As per my understanding, CNN is a reliable source. If you deem CNN to not be a reliable source, please note that there exist other statements in the same article also citing CNN. These statements should also be removed if CNN is indeed unreliable. Thank you. Sangeetratnakar (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The disposition of the case is unsourced; only the accusation was sourced, which was not pursued. Either source both or not at all.  General Ization Talk  23:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sangeetratnakar, this is a contentious issue which has been discussed on the talk page without reaching consensus. We do not normally mention accusations that do not result in convictions (and in this case we don't even have a charge). It is arguably a BLP violation to mention this at all, and it certainly is not appropriate to mention it without even stating that he denied the accusation. Take this to the article's talk page ort leave it alone. Meters (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nick Carter (singer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  23:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

U. Rajesh
I see you reverted my change to U. Rajesh. Are you planning to address the wikipolicy concerns about putting information from both points of view in the section? Jacqke (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I would definitely like to do that. However, I was unable to find any source with the opposite view/denial of the allegation. Sangeetratnakar (talk) 19:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I had similar difficulty after writing to you. Best wishes Jacqke (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * How can allegations qualify to be put on a person's bio? Whether someone cares to deny it or not, allegations unless proven cannot be included. I can only see a personal attack and motive from the person who has included this trying malign the reputation for reasons best known to own self.  102.220.159.182 (talk) 12:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * That is not how Wikipedia works at all. Credible allegations sourced to reliable reporting are frequently included in articles, including biographies of living persons. There is no policy or guideline that universally prohibits the inclusion of reliably sourced and credible allegations, you must be basing your argument on a personal intuition or a misunderstanding. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on U. Rajesh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.