User talk:Sanjanamahtani/sandbox

Overall, I think you need more sources and more frequent citations in each section. For example, the "Measurement" section only has 1 citation. TiffanyLiu12 (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

I think it would be easier to read and understand if you maybe separated the Personology & Psychiatry into two different subheadings. Although they would be short sections if you did this, I think it would help with the readers understanding of the concepts.Katem0315 (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

"According to Henry A. Murray, personology is "The branch of psychology which concerns itself with the study of human lives and the factors that influence their course which investigates individual differences and types of personality… the science of men, taken as gross units… encompassing “psychoanalysis” (Freud), “analytical psychology” (Jung), “individual psychology” (Adler) and other terms that stand for methods of inquiry or doctrines rather than realms of knowledge.""

For this section, make sure you internally link people and important topics. Overall, you definitely need to add more citations, mainly in the "Measuring" section and the "Historical Development" one as well. --Anjinimathur (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Grammar and structure could use some work on the first section where the multiple tests are examined and talked about. Some of the key concepts like psychiatry need to be hyperlinked as well within their sections. Also, hyperlinks should be used when the idea is first introduced, where personology is not given a link until it is used the second time. Make sure that the writing also follows the pyramid writing style where it goes from overall ideas that are most important to more specific types. Ctadelman (talk) 17:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Ctadelman