User talk:Sanjitchohan

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Udaipur, Rajasthan has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://apnaudaipur.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

May 2009
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. MrOllie (talk) 18:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

September 2009 -- Dungarpur
Hi, I've just removed your link from Dungarpur. This is because there was no additional content added to the page, and the link did not seem to be worthwhile. Feel free to discuss my change with me on my talk page if you would like :) -- Casmith_789 (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, one coincidence I have noticed is that the name of the blog's user is similar to yours. Also, the blog was created five days ago and is a blog - Wikipedia as a rule does not like to link to such sites as they are not only subject to change but cannot easily be verified as factually accurate. Is there any evidence of this verification by government officials? -- Casmith_789 (talk) 20:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Is a link to the actual official government website (linked on the page) not more useful than a link to the blog, which in turn links to that website with more information? I suspect the blog summarised some of the information on the other website and then linked to it, so it would be more beneficial to just link to the external website. -- Casmith_789 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A website that you (or others) maintain by editing it cannot possibly be a source. By that basis Wikipedia would be a source to itself. You are free to edit the content of the wikipedia page instead to keep it up to date; perhaps this would be an amicable way of resolving the situation? -- Casmith_789 (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I encourage you to have a look at this: External_links, especially 'Links to be avoided' numbers 11: "Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies)". and 12: "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. These guidelines show that blogs should not be linked to, especially if there is only one editor in the blog. Hope you understand! -- Casmith_789 (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)