User talk:Sanjivkumarsharma

Speedy deletion of Latest Practices at Petrol Stations
A tag has been placed on Latest Practices at Petrol Stations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Ravenswing  19:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pirthipur Una
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pirthipur Una, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jagun (talk) 18:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Una.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Una.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 18:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I got a message as given below when i had not logged on and was just checking the articles: User talk:59.94.250.173 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [edit]January 2008 Hi, the recent edit you made to KDE has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. • AndonicO Hail! 14:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to KDE constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. • AndonicO Hail!14:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to KDE. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. • AndonicO Hail! 14:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I have not done this. Is some body else is using my internet connection. Kindly help--Sanjivdogra (talk) 09:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It means that someone who uses the same IP that you logged in with made some vandal edits. Don't worry about it. Prince of Canadat 09:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Violations
I think some body is trying to destroy the essence of the page regarding Falgu Tirath. I have tried to resalvage the page. I do not know much about the syntax of wikipedia language. kindly guide.
 * Please read the links provided in the green box above; they will teach you about Wikipedia syntax. Cheers. Prince of Canadat 18:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Falgu Tirath
Thank you for contributing the article on Falgu Tirath. I am sorry that you thought that I was trying to destroy the essence of the article - it was certainly not my intention to damage the article. I have left a comment discussing my concerns with the article, and the reasoning behind my edits, on its talk page here. Best wishes Jll (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I will like to send a message to other user. How to send the message to him. I will like to send the following message to Jll "I am sorry if i have hurt you. Your comments are very good since the article does not clarify regarding the village or temple or what. Tirath means holy pilgrimage and Falgu is a village wherehindus go on pilgrimage to do Pind Daans. The Pind Daans are offering made by Hindus to liberate their forefathers of any sins made and to have their blessings. The second reference basically relates to the ceremony of the Pind Daan. I think you can help in upgrading the article."Sanjivdogra (talk) 07:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Sanjiv. To send a message to another user, you click on the link to their 'talk' page, and add a message the same way you add a message here. Prince of Canadat 07:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Sanjiv, no worries. Your excellent explanation and changes to the article have made it very much clearer for me, thank you. I can see that the article is a useful addition to Wikipedia, and much more significant than just a small settlement. Best wishes, Jason. Jll (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome
You're welcome for the help. But no, I cannot provide you with price information about solar power, or whatever you were asking for. That's your job and you get paid for it. Cheers. Prince of Canadat 08:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guru-da-Gaddi
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Guru-da-Gaddi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KCinDC (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you start the article off with "Guru-da-Gaddi is..." and explain what it is? Is it a festival or a person or what? —KCinDC (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Guru-da-Gaddi is an important occasion of Sikh Religion. This is very very important time when the tenth Guru had stated that the next Guru is the Holy Sikh Book "Guru Granth sahib". I don't feel such an artcile should be deleted. Rest is Wikipedia policy. It is recommended that Sikh Scholars may be consulted on the subject. I am proud that I tried to create an article on the subject.Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 17:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It certainly sounds like a topic worthy of an article, and I meant no disrespect. The article needs to be written in such a way that it explains what Guru-da-Gaddi is. It can be started as a stub without going into great detail or requiring a scholar. Just start with a sentence or two at the beginning explaining what it is. —KCinDC (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems strange that something so important would not be mentioned in the Sikhism article. —KCinDC (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I am also not able to understand the above. But you can very well understand that today, the day of start of celebrations, has been declared a holiday by Governments of Indian state of Punjab, Haryana and Union Territory of Chandigarh. Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 18:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 300 Years of Khalsa
I have nominated 300 Years of Khalsa, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/300 Years of Khalsa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC) KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC).

I think it should be deleted because many educated men in India are yet to be connected to net/wikipedia and also it basically enlarges the scope of article by the title of khalsa. Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Solar Powered Petrol Stations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Solar Powered Petrol Stations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  howcheng  {chat} 21:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

helpme The Mumbai Terror Attacks 2008 needs to be put on the main page. How to do it.
 * I agree. Go to In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates and nominate it for addition. - NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  19:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * In fact, I liked your idea so much that I nominated it myself. - NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  19:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

OK SirSanjivkumarsharma (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Siri-Guru-Granth-300-Anniv.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Siri-Guru-Granth-300-Anniv.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 17:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Bitumin Grades
undefinedI have observed that someone has redirected the new page Grades of Bitumin to Bitumin. I wanted to add some information in the same which is useful for engineers and as such the page should be separate. The details of the various specifications of different grades of bitumin used in paving are available in the site http://www.bharatpetroleum.com/business/specialities_Bitumen.asp?from=bus. No information on this is available in wikipedia. The topic is of specific use for the engineers. What to do.Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello. I redirected your page because it didn't appear to have enough material to warrant an article. It's great to see that you are willing to add such material, but may I suggest that you add it as a section on the main Bitumen page? That page is looking quite bare and could certainly use some attention! If the information is indeed to substantial, then it will be much easier to split it when it is complete. :) &raquo; \ / (⁂) 11:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

OK Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

1971 births
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. This is covered at 1971. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Promotions and Transfers
I have nominated Promotions and Transfers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Promotions and Transfers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Promotions and Transfers
A tag has been placed on Promotions and Transfers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Patton t / c 16:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

The Page has been meant for deletion. But I think the page can become one stop solution for the undermentioned purposes:

1.0 The advantages of Promotions and Transfers, 2.0 The research on the topic and 3.0 One stop page for every body to know the links to the pages which affects their lives for atleast one year. Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

How to stop Page Deletion
helpme on how to avoid deletion of the page on "Promotions and Transfers"
 * If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding hangon to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay.
 * - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the Page "Promotions and Transfers" is being deleted
Subject is my enquiry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjivkumarsharma (talk • contribs) 17:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see the reasons at Articles for deletion/Promotions and Transfers. Stifle (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the Pages are being deleted Unnecessarily
I have developed a feeling that the wikipedia is not having administrators who understand the needs and requirements of South Asian People. They are having knowledge of Americas only. That's why they are deleting the pages without understanding the issues involved. What to do. . Please no comments that it's wikipedia policy. It needs to be throughly researched. Sanjivkumarsharma (talk) 17:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We are not trying to show bias for or against anyone. If you think that you have had your page deleted unfairly, you can always ask an administrator. User:Tone deleted the Promotions and Transfers page.  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

There is no bias here whatsoever. There is, however, certain minimum requirements for inclusion. WP:NOTABILITY can tell you what you need to know. In a nutshell, articles about schools below the high school level are generally considered non-notable. The site was being overrun at one time with vaguely written articles about elementary schools and as such, it became an administrative nightmare to keep up with the influx. Unless you can prove via reliable outside sources that this particular school is notable, it simply doesn't meet the qualifications for inclusion. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

ThanksSanjivkumarsharma (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your comments. Shyamsunder (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Villages of Himachal Pradesh


A tag has been placed on Villages of Himachal Pradesh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Paalappoo (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg
Hello,

I am sending this message to you since you are from Himachal Pradesh.

Please see this discussion.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mahasaraswati.jpg

Can you help in any way.

Please send me a message.

Thank you.

Sankarrukku (talk) 03:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lube Bottling Plant


The article Lube Bottling Plant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 04:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oil Industry Safety Directorate


The article Oil Industry Safety Directorate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article has been calling for help for over a year, it is merely a list of 110 guideline headings for oil companies that have to work in india. There is no mention of what these guidelines say, all we have is a list of 110 headings.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Des pay re ( talk ) 09:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Oil Industry Safety Directorate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oil Industry Safety Directorate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oil Industry Safety Directorate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beagel (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IndianOil-Adani Gas Pvt Ltd


A tag has been placed on IndianOil-Adani Gas Pvt Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  11:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Villages of Himachal Pradesh
Hi I'd like to let you know that I've poposed the deletion of an article you created, Villages of Himachal Pradesh, for deletion. The topic is an interesting one but the article really contains no solid information and has no refern came, and it seems that you stopped working on it a while ago. All the best Mccapra (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)