User talk:SannSK/sandbox

Hello, some suggestions I would make is that you should add a little more to the abstract and also label it abstract at the top of the section. I really liked the pathophysiology description and the causes section where you described what autosomal recessive means and then the cause, so good job! --Prachipatel7 (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Do not label your abstract!

Hi, I really like your abstract and use of the image to show the inheritance. I think all your other sections made sense but could use more support. Also I wouldn't label the abstract as that is the first thing people see and does not need to be described as an abstract. You have all the sections there and I do think you have a tough subject so I like where it is at. Because there are not many diagnosed cases I can understand why there is little information.Zbezilla (talk) 02:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Zbezilla

--Sweiner02 (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Well organized and well cited! Also, lots of good links to other wikipedia pages.
 * Cause looks like you still need to do a little writing work: some still appears to be in notes format.
 * Very nice pathophysiology section.
 * There are a couple good recent research studies that are not just cases. They're not about treatment, but you should still address them in recent research.