User talk:Sanoseattle

Raqib nizami (talk) 12:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)I urge you, yet again, to if you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary. please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policy, particularly on Primary Sources, on Reliable Sources, on Verifiability and on Citing Sources. Finally, to quote, William Pietri: "Wikipedia's articles are no place for strong views. Or rather, we feel about strong views the way that a natural history museum feels about tigers. We admire them and want our visitors to see how fierce and clever they are, so we stuff them and mount them for close inspection. We put up all sorts of carefully worded signs to get people to appreciate them as much as we do. But however much we adore tigers, a live tiger loose in the museum is seen as an urgent problem." "Consider reading through the Wikipedia policies to get an appreciation for what we're up to. A good place to start is Wikipedia:Five pillars. You'll come to see that although these may feel constraining, they will work in your favour over the long haul: when people with opposing views to yours turn up, we will be equally diligent in making sure that they don't delete inconvenient facts or links to your views."