User talk:Sans13910

October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Law of Michigan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Law of Michigan was changed by Sans13910 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973685 on 2021-10-29T15:08:36+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Law of Michigan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC) SONIC.EXE I HATE U

November 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User talk:Serols—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sans (November 12)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sans Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: It is not entirely clear what this draft is about, but it does not establish notability and will not establish notability. It is not written in an encyclopedic style.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)