User talk:Santiago Lodré

September 2015
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Chica Dorada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/La_Chica_Dorada check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/La_Chica_Dorada?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Charts
Hi, please read WP:CHARTS for a list of music charts accepted on en.wiki. Some of those you added to Paulina Rubio articles had to be removed because considered unofficial and dodgy.  ×°˜`°× ηαη¢у  ×°˜`°×  15:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Paulina was not certified 6x platinum.
The Amprofon website is clear about the certification of the album Paulina. It was certified 4x platinum, not 6x. It was me years ago, that put the 6x platinum in the article, my bad. The 2x platinum came before the 4 time platinum. There's no indication that tis album was cert. 6x insted of 4x. It's an error in the Amprofon website. I'll revert your edition soon.--88marcus (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * It was certified 2x Platinum in 2000 and 4x Platinum in 2001 .--88marcus (talk) 18:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 88marcus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paulina (album)‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.--88marcus (talk) 23:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Bésame En La Boca (1995 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bésame En La Boca (1995 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Stop including fake charts in Paulina Rubio's articles
Hi, please read WP:CHARTS for a list of music charts accepted on en.wiki. You keep using charts that are unreliable, do you think those information are encyclopedic to stay in Wikipedia? It seems that you want to do in Paulina's articles a blog for fans, and that's not what Wikipedia is.--88marcus (talk) 19:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

What's your probleam with Paulina sales?
I don't understand why you want to include inflated sales in each Paulina's article. Do you think someone will believe she sold millions of copies of an album that didn't performed anywhere, which sold only in Mexico (where we know sold 350,000). I work in those articles a lot, I search sales for most of her albums and included them here in Wikipedia, even the old one that are more hard to find. I did the same for Thalía, and believe me, I found a lot of sources that says that Amor a la mexicana sold 3,5 millions and En extasis 2 million, but I didn't included here because it's obvious that those albums didn't sold that amount of copies, they didn't performed that well in Europe or Asia and only were success in countries that we gost a gold certification for sales of 40,000. I also changed the inflated sales for both artists, most articles says Thalia sold 50 millions, but I changed that to 25 millions because its more accurated and changed Paulina's sales from 40 millions to 15 millions, there's no way this girl sold that amount of copies, even a singer like Jennifer Lopez didn't sold 40 million albums worldwide. I hope you understand.--88marcus (talk) 22:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Paulina's certification in Mexico
Paulina has 4 certifications, the site is clear about that. I don't know if you're fan of her a long time but I am. In the old AMPROFON website, the certifications info were not included like it is today, it was like the RIAA. And you could see each time an album got a new certification. In Paulina's case, there were mentions of Gold, Platinum, 2x platinum (2001-07-19) and 4x platinum (2001-07-19). You can see in their facebook page too, there's no 6x platinum for Paulina's sales, only four. It was not certified 5x or 6x, only 4x in 2001. It was my fault because when I did the certification table I forget about that and included 6x not 4x.--88marcus (talk) 22:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Facebook official AMPROFON album


 * 2000: 2x Platinum
 * 2001: 4x Platinum

Please, see in the website and in the facebook about Christina Aguilera's Mi Reflejo album, it was certified Gold in 2000 and Platinum in 2001, that doesn't mean it get Platinum+Gold, but in her case, the website put the certfication correctly. It's a problem of the site not mine.--88marcus (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

2x (in 2000) and 4x (in 2001) not the same as 2x + 4x
You want to add sales and it doesn't work like that, I showed you Amprofon's official facebook, all artists who hit platinum will have a gold one before, years before or even months before, that doesn't mean sales will be Platinum + Gold. The Platinum + Gold certificate comes after the platinum certificate and the site itself puts it when such cases happen. There's no mention of Paulina's 5x platinum nor 6x platinum, the last one is 4x platinum in 2001. It's sad to see certain fans want to inflate the artists' sales and you seem to be one of them. For you sales would be: La Chica Dorada: 3 million, 24 Kilates: 2.3 million, just because a fan put it on a worthless blog...--88marcus (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Rubio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Say Goodbye ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paulina_Rubio check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paulina_Rubio?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Thalía's video from Youtube.
Here in wikipedia you can use Youtube as a source. But the link must be listed in an official Youtube channel because of the copyright. If you find in Youtube an official channel which has Paulina's sales you can included it here too. I found a video of Thalía's 2x gold from her first album, but I couldn't included here because it's fan channel. But you have to specify the name of the tv show, episode etc and the program cannot be created by the artist itself.--88marcus (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You can see here: Videos as references--88marcus (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ananda (album). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You have been warned multiple times about adding unsourced numbers. Please stop this.'' Muhandes (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Paulina sales of El tiempo es oro
The book Solo Exitos doesn't have nothing about Paulina's sales, it has her certifications. In the Ukmix forum I asked an user that has the book if here's info about Paulina's sales and he said: no. I got a pdf of the book and there's no info about it. Can you give me a print with that information (45,000 sold)? An album is certified Gold in Spain with 50,000 copies shipped, El Tiempo es oro didn't charted in Spain and was only released years after its original release, no single to radios was released to promote it and Paulina was not very popular there to sold almost a Gold record in sales. That's no way an album sold that amount of copies, when they re-released the album it didn't performed in the charts too.--88marcus (talk) 17:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Rubio videography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Say Goodbye ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paulina_Rubio_videography check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paulina_Rubio_videography?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Rubio discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boys Will Be Boys ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paulina_Rubio_discography check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paulina_Rubio_discography?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Paulina Rubio Inflated sales
We discussed before about those inflated sales that media keep printing about all kinds of artists including Paulina. Most of those albums sales from the source you include are completely unrealistic. The sales you put in the article must be near to the certifications, and proportional to the album performance worldwide. That's what made is made in that article List of best-selling music artists, the total amount of the artists are included based most about the certifications they heve, even though fans and media keep inflating artists sales. Most Paulina's album were only certified in few latin countries and even the certifications of most of them toghether are not even near 500,000 copies worldwide. That's why we keep 1 million to Border Girl, not 3.2 million like you did. If that album sold that amount of copies why it didn't perfeormed in charts worldwide? Why it was not even certified higher in Mexico or United States and so on? I hope you understand.--88marcus (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree with 88marcus. Those sales are unrealist for an artist who just received certifications in a few Latin countries + Spain. Even, in the official body of Argentina, CAPIF, e.g her name wasn't never listed, not even Brazil. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Promotional links and content
Hello, I'm Normal Op. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Normal Op (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Normal Op (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Border Girl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhapsody.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Rubio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Rubio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Usage of archive-date
The archive-date argument is being misused in Paulina Rubio possibly elsewhere. The argument is only required when there is also a archive-url. The two go in a pair, never alone. It has no meaning or purpose alone. Archive date of what? It's the archive date of the archive URL in the archive-url field. Example:  Note how 2021-06-21 equals the date in archive-url (20210621). This is the only purpose. -- Green  C  03:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ayúdame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alien.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paulina Remixes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ananda (album), you may be blocked from editing. ''You added much content but almost no sources. I didn't revert your edits, but please go back and add sources.'' Muhandes (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El Tiempo Es Oro (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hi I see that you recently added back a chart on the articles Border Girl and Pau-Latina despite those being removed multiple times in the past because they come from Musicalia which is a WP:SINGLEVENDOR so please don't do this again. FanDePopLatino (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add bad charts, as you did at Border Girl, you may be blocked from editing. I've removed those WP:SINGLEVENDOR charts so please don't add them again and if you aren't sure if a chart is reliable or not you can read WP:CHARTS for a list of charts that are acceptable in wikipedia. FanDePopLatino (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abriendo las puertas al amor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Undiscussed move reverted
An editor objected - rightly from what I can tell, though that's not the point - to your undiscussed move of Sexi Dance to the title of the promotional single English variant Sexy Dance. I personally have no opinion on this, but have reverted it per the intention of the other editor. If you want to make a case for changing the article from the Spanish song to the English version by all means do so, but please either gain consensus on the Talk page or initiate a formal WP:RM. All the best In ictu oculi (talk) 14:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lejos de aquí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)