User talk:Saoul91

Welcome!
Hello, Saoul91 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! --Geniac (talk) 00:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Connie E-mail
Hey, just wondering if there's been any response from Connie with regards to the article? I've had some pretty good responses in the Teahouse for some formatting questions I've had.

Cheers

Bellsniff123 (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Connie Email
Not heard anything back yet. That sounds like a good idea, what sort of things have you found out? 17:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

There's 2 main ways which we can use to kick-start the page, either using the manual of style or by looking at other scholars here and using a similar format to whats been used. Would be cool to get this page kick-started either asap as I think that will generate more ideas from everyone in the group. Bellsniff123 (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

I've just been creating a provisional page on my sandbox. Come see ... User:Saoul91/sandbox Saoul91 (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

That's flippin ace!! It's sectioned off really nicely. . . very nice work Bellsniff123 (talk) 13:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Bellsniffer :P Add to it, whatever you have and we can start to build it up and refine it later (i plan to rewrite my bits properly in due course)Saoul91 (talk) 13:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile Saoul91!!Face-smile.svg
Nice to see you at the Teahouse! I hope you like to be here,if you have any question (s),feel free to leave me a message,and I will respond soon! Carliitaeliza  TALK  23:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested to publish article
I have requested for the article currently on my sandbox to be published. This way, we can post it to the teahouse and get feedback on it. Doesn't matter that it is not yet finished, we can continue to add, however it is important that we start getting more engagement. Saoul91 10:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

I've just been tightening my section but it's ready to be added now. Cheers Bellsniff123 (talk) 10:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

OK. I've fixed some spellings and fixed up the heading styles on the Areas of research section. Mogzilla91 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Danger High voltage! 15:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Addressing the subject
Hello guys, I've noticed a lot of variation throughout the article involving how Connie is addressed. Having this issue in mind I addressed this to the Teahouse who told me that the subject should be addressed by a mixture of surname and 'she'. These are the answers I have had back:

Use a mix of "she" and the surname, never the forename. Roger (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Full name first time a person is mentioned, surname in subsequent mentions, unless it's obvious who you're talking about and comes soon after using the name, in which case she/he is fine. ie. You don't need to repeat the surname several times in quick successsion, especially within the same sentence, unless someone else has also been mentioned and it might be confusing who you're talking about. Footnote73 (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

See WP:LASTNAME for more.--ukexpat (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

(You can find my question titled 'Writing Style' on the Teahouse)

Following that, each of us need to review our sections and edit as necessary. For continuity sake I think we shall just stick to Varnhagen rather than Dr Varnhagen (Sorry Sam)

Saoul91 (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * That's how I've been referring to her on my section so that's all gravy. Mogzilla91 (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I've been using just her last name, so have made some minor tweaks so it's not so monotonous. cheers Bellsniff123 (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

There's more stuff here, not just on addressing the subject, in case we need to touch up the article at all to fit in with this style. Manual of Style. Kaolincash (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Whoops, I just saw that's already been linked to. Sorry! Kaolincash (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BO &#124; Talk 00:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program
Hi Saoul91! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 16:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Varnhagen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Connie Varnhagen has been accepted
 Connie Varnhagen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.