User talk:Saposni2/AcetylCyanide

Review 1
This article looks really good. Your chembox is very detailed and has a lot of information in it. The main part of the article is also done very well. The sections are detailed and the reaction pictures look really good. The formatting and the references look good as well. I don't think you have to change anything much for your final draft, because it looks pretty good as is. Ktmass (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 2
This page has a lot of information on it that is very useful. The only thing is that for your last reaction the spelling from the compound comes down such that it is not a clean look on the page. Overall, the page is very good, not many mistakes, everything looks clean. Good job! Mpate52 (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 3
This article is really well done. My only suggestion would be to have more sections in your main article that isn't already covered in your chembox. Your chembox already has a lot of good information so it'd be good to have a more variety of topics for your main article if you felt like expanding on it. Otherwise, it looks good! smunoz2 (talk Smunoz2 (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review 4
Very good job on the formatting of this page; everything looks cohesive and is easy to read. You have provided plenty of information on the intermolecular properties of this compound, and the reactions it partakes in. You might want to add more information about the application of this compound and its usages. This will give your page another layer. Great job though! (Jcyeung2 (talk) 05:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC))