User talk:Saquonisthegoat

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jacob deGrom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saquon Barkley, you may be blocked from editing. DannyS712 (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

A little advice
If an anonymous person from the future visited me, I sure wouldn't be stupid enough to post it on Wikipedia. First, I'd make him/her/it verify that they actually knew the future, and weren't just some prankster punking me. Second, I'd make sure he couldn't escape. Third, I wouldn't be wasting my time on Wikipedia - I'd be signing up at every online brokerage and betting site I could think of. So, the next time you get a tip from the future, be smart and don't post it on Wikipedia. - BilCat (talk) 04:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)