User talk:Sara050719

November 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Taylor Kinney, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ''


 * Agreed. Please engage in discussion. Reverting with the same copy-and-pasted edit summary is not going to accomplish anything. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel  ‖ 06:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I have already given a valid reason for editing so I don't understand why it has been removed. It's written that sources can't be GOSSIPS or RUMORS so I don't understand why you don't want to remove the article based on rumors and gossips, because Gaga, Kinney or their reps haven't confirmed "break-up" or "cancelling the engagement". Everything else are just gossips that aren't reliable so I would like to know why it's accepted. Sara050719 talk? 16:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Taylor Kinney
Hi there. I've reverted your edit on Taylor Kinney as there needs to be a consensus gained for the article to have the information removed through a discussion on the talk page. Another editor has already started a thread on there to discuss their view as to why the information should stay. Due to a reliable source having been provided, Wikipedia policy on living persons provides that this information needs to remain until a consensus and reliable sources are gained to change this position.

In addition, as you have came very close to having attempted to remove the content three times in 24 hours, you are at risk of breaching the 3 revert rule, which can see you blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you believe that there does need to be a change made, please discuss it on the talk page before attempting to make the edit again. Thank you and happy editing! -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 06:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)