User talk:Saragmeholm

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Wild Wind Kennel LLC
I think that i came across this specific article at least 4 times now, each time necessitating a deletion of the article. To summarize:
 * The article is about a non notable company, that doesn't warrant a Wikipedia page.
 * Part of the page is a Copyright violation, which has to be deleted for legal reasons.
 * Half the article trails off into an entirely different topic on animal treatment.
 * The article is Libel, with no other intend then being negative about its subject. Justified or not, this is by no means tolerable.
 * The article contains non-public personal details (Contact information). Same as above, not tolerable.

I'd point out that Wikipedia is not intended for advocacy or Scandal mongering, which seems to be the goal of the article. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)