User talk:Sarah/Archive6

RfA
You're going to accept I presume? Blnguyen | rant-line 06:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I came to your talk page to ask of you if you'd ever considered becoming an administrator here at Wikipedia? I then discovered this heading addressing my exact question, and wondered if something was already afoot? I'd be happy to nominate you if it hasn't already occured. -- Longhair 05:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I think you'd make a fine administrator, and will let what's already evolved run its' course. I do hope you decide to accept. Be sure to let me know once your request is online so I can lend my support. -- Longhair 05:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Why remove the gallery?
Hi Sarah! I was wondering why you removed the photo gallery from the article on the Sydney Opera House. I believe it really gives the article something extra, and it would be quite preposterous to have all the images on there own, and the are really descriptive, beautiful images of the Opera House. I can really not see where you’re disagreement of the gallery is coming from. Please answer this on my user talk page. Jfp-24 11:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar vandalism
Thanks for sorting this out re User:Jeyler. He left a message for you here accusing you of vandalism, which I have reverted as vandalism. I presume you have no interest in such nonsense, but replace it if you want it recorded. Tyrenius 17:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
Since we're in an "alliance", I thought I would say "Hello". =) -- Gogo Dodo 00:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Over there
One thing to move the "aboriginal name" (which begs more questions than answers) from the much vandalised mania to the south, it seemed at least a talk page item, no? SatuSuro 02:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. Yes a quandary. I'll let it rest. If you are interested in tas things, maybe Cape Barren Island is worth putting on your watchlist, you'll understand when you check it SatuSuro 02:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I was thinking that the uninvited unsigned talk on front of article page needed monitoring just in case he came back again :), and also the article in general needs a cleanup, I just didnt want to be the only editor watching if he did come back, so i have alerted a few others including admins :) SatuSuro 03:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * At least we're not dealing with the 'Bass Strait Triangle' in this art :) sigh SatuSuro 04:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Archiving
Mmm. Tried to set Werdnabot to 7 days, but it hasn't taken much notice. Do you know what's up? Ta. Will sort out other things asap. Tyrenius 19:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Copy-paste move vandal
I see that you asked "Ed" to stop on the latest vandal to the redirects. Who does this refer to? (Feel free to answer me on my talk page). Ryūlóng 07:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

BKPO
We have submitted a article about a company named BKPO. Please review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.163.143 (talk • contribs)

What happened on the Moon
Thanks for stepping in and helping out with this! Brianyoumans 08:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * ...and again, thanks. I'm afraid I have an unfortunate urge to try to talk sense into people like this, but most of the time reason just makes them worse.  I'll stop responding to him now.  --Brianyoumans 09:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Jackp
lol - you were quick tonight with your reverts. He always give himself away with the line "Sydney is famous for its culture Merbabu 13:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Maybe because its true, bloody jerk! Its ok to have room for beaches and landmarks. But when it comes to culture, Sydney is not existant. HAAAA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.6.138.34 (talk • contribs)
 * ha ha, Jackp calls me a jerk. Must mean i (and others like me) are doing something right!. Merbabu 01:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Anthony Head
You're smart (or a Buffy fan...). It's blocked indefinitely now. Ta! Tyrenius 06:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Global cities
Oh, I see it’s ok to provide information on film festivals, fashion events or major finance companies in cities such as Toronto, Tokyo or NYC, but it isn’t ok to have room for Sydney and its Opera company, total bias! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.6.138.34 (talk • contribs)

OK
OK, if you are not going to respond with something sensible, we will take this to another level. Pity this has to happen with you being so new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfman97 (talk • contribs)
 * I left this editor a message about his unacceptable badgering of you. --Guinnog 15:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. We're all in this together! Still thinking about RfA? ;) --Guinnog 16:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, in that case let me thank you for your support. That was a lovely thing to say, even if I did fish for it somewhat! In all seriousness, and with no disrespect to the individual opposers, I wonder if the RfA process may need a re-examination? I feel like I'm on the rack here... which was the fear that held me back from accepting the nom in the first place. On the other hand, I've been heartened by some of the (to me) surprising support votes. Oh well, and I'm not quite down yet I suppose. --Guinnog 16:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Pnatt
Bainer, could you please look at User:- 40, User:- 41 and User:- 42? They're User:Pnatt socks/impersonators. I reported it at AIV, but no one seems to be around and as you can see, he's rampaging through Australian articles converting CBD > downtown. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I noticed those, and figured they were all socks of each other, although I didn't know who the puppeteer was. I've blocked those three for the time being, and there's a case now filed at Suspected sock puppets/Pnatt (2nd) if you have any more to add. --bainer (talk) 11:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I just added and . - 39 has been blocked but -38 hasn't yet. I hope he doesn't have another 37 of these to cycle through. :/ Thanks, Bainer. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * That one's blocked too now. Hopefully the autoblock will hit him soon, although given the sheer number of socks he probably has a dynamic IP. A checkuser may be in order. --bainer (talk) 11:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

reversions you've made
Sarah - you reverted the external links I made on 20 August regarding elder law, annuities and end-of-life matters - is there a reason? please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Help4srs (talk • contribs)

Mechanics Institutes
Hi - Saw your edit to the Mechanics Institutes page and your new article on the Institute at Sorrento. I have started an article on the Insittutes and similar bodies in Australia at Cultural institutions in Australia. I have chosen a generic title as I wanted to capture Schools of Art and Literary Insitutes as well. I would welcome suggestions for a better article title. Regards --Arktos talk 21:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Unblocked from Commons
Thanks for helping getting me unblocked from Commons! Mdoc7 23:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, you didn't do much, but moving my comment to the proper page was enough. But I contest the idea that my talk page is not mine to delete the contents, and I've never heard of warx before then. So I was actually dis-inclined to answer his query, especially since he didn't even identify himself; I thought he/she was nosy. It's not up to me to find out who he is. Thanks again for the unsolicited help. --Mdoc7 18:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm, OK thanks for the heads up on that; I thought you might say something like that. I won't make the page my own, cuz that's not why I'm here. (Actually, the help you gave wasn't unsolicited by me.... just indirect-- I did ask for help. You answered it.)  It's just strange to hear that content deletion (that we're talking about)is taken as an insult by anyone, considering a complete stranger would just pop in and ask a seemingly stupid one-liner question right out of the blue. Anyway-- I'm new here, I'll just abide by the rules. And browse the guidelines. Thanks, Mdoc7 16:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Cheerios, Sarah; my first name is Michael. Mdoc7 18:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Delmer J. Yoakum
Does the pic in the "Professional life" section work? It doesn't appear for me, but it does for the uploader. Tyrenius 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ta. Strange how it doesn't at all for me, nor on the image page. Oh well. Tyrenius 02:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Sarah for the fix on Erich Schiffmann KarateLadyKarateLady 16:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Spamtastic
Do you like my new warning for modern art spamlinks? See User_talk:Emmarella. -- Tyrenius 17:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Ta! No I hadn't noticed. Good job someone knows what's happening on my user page. I think probably more by luck than judgement it has dropped into quite a neat position. Why do such templates have a life of their own? I noticed your neat tweak to the lead section on DeBarra Mayo. Of course, you dooooooo understand I just hacked it into shape quickly and would never of course repeat the same word normally in such proximity etc!!! :) Tyrenius 17:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Confirm Chumby AfD?
Will you vote to keep Articles_for_deletion/Chumby now that many new verifiable sources have released - the product website is even back up. If not, please explain, thanks! --x1987x(talk) 23:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mahesh_Pathak

 * I would like to point out and  I am not able to understand the difference between these two discussions _Doctor Bruno_ _Talk_ /E Mail  12:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Question for Sarah
Hi Sarah, I have questions about Wikisource and thought maybe you could help or route me to somebody who could. I think I put things in articles that maybe were supposed to go in Wikisource.

Also, does a person have to have a Wiki article in order to be put on a list? I added an article yesterday of a female bodybuilder who won a national title in 1981, but it might not be notable enough to qualify for a regular article. I added her to a list because I know she was ranked and listed in Joe Weider's mags in the 80s.

In general I am somewhat confused about notability when presenting new articles, especially bios. I spent yesterday getting aquainted with the bio procedure and I have a better idea now of the protocol, but I'm still confused on some points. For example, there is an article David C. Lane that seems like it needs to be more Wikied. Is this a good example? On the other hand, I added an article Ariel Tomioka who is notable in certain communities and she is an author, but I can't find much bio on her, so she may not qualify as notable. Is a lot of bio info needed in order to be considered notable? Oops forgot to sign my name. KarateLadyKarateLady 18:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

---I have found my answers since posting this, Sarah, so please disregard. KarateLadyKarateLady 01:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Sarah
I have never met a person by the name of Sarah that I didn't like. There was a song named Sarah done by the Jefferson Starship years ago. I loved that song and the group. See...I'm stuck in the 80s! :)

Thanks for you comments. This real life stuff gets in the way when one is trying to wiki. I had surgery 2 weeks ago and my husband is making me rest, so I'm getting time to learn the wiki-ways since I can't do much else. I'm even getting ready to add a "wikify" tag to an article. Cheers to you too! KarateLadyKarateLady 16:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Good link on Talk:DeBarra Mayo to have a look at. We're getting somewhere. Tyrenius 19:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Altered states
Thanks for explaining the state abbreviation issue. I've been wondering about that but forgot to ask. I appreciate the well wishes too. Happy wikiing... KarateLadyKarateLady 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Just found your message about the technical reason related to this. Thanks again. :) KarateLadyKarateLady 15:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyright owner request to remove image from Wikipedia
New question... The image is at "Cessna 414" in the search box. It used to be on Keith Green also, 'til I removed it on request of copyright owner (image owner?). I obtained permission for its use on Wikipedia under GFDL (and sent evidence of approval via email to permissions@wikipedia), sent him the links where used, and now her wants 'em completely removed because it might hurt his business. And he wants to make sure it's removed. To use incorrect grammar, "Do I gotta comply?" The image is a 3-dimensional illustration of a Cessna 414 airplane. I'm delaying removal from Cessna 414 page til I get input from you or anyone. ---Mdoc7 19:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I'll remove it, and check out the guy you mentioned. Thanks --Mdoc7 15:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

LinuxBeak... heh heh. Mdoc7 15:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Sarah
Sarah, Thank you for the kind note and ongoing help.

I did not feel the notability tag was negative, so not to worry. :) I was just trying to put a general plea out there to folks who were familiar with Erich so we could get it expanded. I thought maybe the New Age category had been placed in error. He is regarded more as a yoga purist.

I completely trust your assessment of articles. Your editing style is impressive. Editing is tedious work and I admire this talent you have.

You and Tyrenius do exceptional work. I hope I have not added gray hairs to too many heads on here; I know that I have a few more today than I did 2 weeks ago. Thank goodness for hair color.

Off topic...that puppy on your user page is adorable. KarateLadyKarateLady 17:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

talk and contact
Hey Sarah, It's been a while.. :) I was going through some Archives and saw that you suggested I change my signature from the 'Contact' page to my talk page, for various reasons. I've since done so, and I definetly can see where your coming from :). Thanks for your (always helpful) comments. --D e on555talkReview 00:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

G'day
Hey Deon, nice to hear from you. Thanks for your message; I'm glad you found my comment about your talk link helpful. By the way, I noticed on your userpage that you go to Monash Uni, you're very young. Did you skip some school or something? Feel free to ignore that question if it's private, I'm just curious. :) As you know, I thought you were a few years older than you are and being at uni early could be why you seem older. Hope alls well with you, Deon, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You may be notable as a prodigy :) -- Samir धर्म 10:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC) (sorry for eavesdropping, by the way)
 * Hi Sarah (and Samir :) ). Nah, i'm not sure how that stayed there: i put it there ages ago on the template (for next year), and I thought i removed it.. :P Again: ur comments are useful. I'll be at Monash Clayton next year for a kinda weird experience to do with VCAL and VCE the year after.. I'll be doing 3 days at school (home :) ), 1 day Monash and 1 day at Work.. It's a trial-type thing that Monash Clayton is doing next year, and hopefully it will stay, kind of like an extra year (even though it's only 1 day a week), but that works out to around a term of uni, kind of like a 0th Year :P, to see if thats the course i'm really interested in, and give me time to Change my preference if need be. Thanks for the note. All is well here :), and I hope all's well there. Thanks! --D e on555talkReview 11:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) No worries about the whole 'eavesdropping' thing Samir.. I dont *really* :P have anything to hide, and it creates a kind of community-conversation type which is all friendly and all, and yeh I'll go now :). Have a good 'un. -D e on555talkReview


 * Yeh I'm gonna love it :), and the whole Child Prodigy thing sounds pretty cool ;) *quote* Well _I'm_ notable enought to have a page on Wikipedia.. *quote* some friends i've got :P, :o i hope ur gettin some of those brownies :P --D e on555talkReview 23:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC).

It's usually cookies (my baking skills are limited to cookies and brownies), but I didn't have time this weekend. Have a virtual one instead? Cheers -- Samir धर्म 02:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Merryhobby
Mr Mets, I noticed that User:Merryhobby posted another long message here and I'm moving it back to his own talk page. I am going to ask him to post his questions and comments on his own page so other can respond to him as I feel his badgering of you has been really over the top. Please revert me if you disagree and would like his comment here. Hang in there, mate. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 15:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC) I've been really busy with work, but I have tomorrow off and I'm planning on having a go at the RfA questions then. So, if I can get the courage up, I'll do it soon. :)  Sarah Ewart (Talk) 17:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was just about to move it to his talk page and say the same thing as well :-). — Mets 501  (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent. I'm glad I didn't do the wrong thing! By the way, your friend User:Maxasus in the section above titled "A reply" is a sock of indefinitely blocked User:Joshuarooney. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have no idea why Maxasus/Joshuaroony was replying to me (I don't think I ever had contact with him), so I'll just ignore it. :) — Mets 501 (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, just out of curiosity, when do you think you're going to run for adminship? — Mets 501 (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. I've noticed a few other strange messages he's left various people. He also started Requests for adminship/Maxasus where he openly declares he's Joshuarooney, so I'm not sure what he's up to. :/
 * Can't wait to support! :-) — Mets 501 (talk) 17:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That's really nice to know. I'm glad you haven't changed your mind! :) Sarah Ewart (Talk) 17:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That would really be a first if the nominator opposed! :-) — Mets 501 (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not really, remember the recent, weird saga of JTKiefer and Pegasus? BTW Sarah, I will also offer strong support if/when you are a candidate for admin.  Regards, Newyorkbrad 19:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Dryslwyn
That's the obvious thing to do, I think. I'll sort out other things you mentioned when I can. Tyrenius 22:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for fixing this - I was born nearby, I drive past the castle every time I go home (proper home that is!) and Dryslwyn was our dialling code! Alunwyn 18:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Backslashing
I never knew that. Is there somewhere I can quickly readup before I remove editing abilities? Not that I don't trust your judgement, but I like to be "in the know" before I aim. -- Longhair 05:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Found this, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies. -- Longhair 05:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. Learn somethig every day. Zscout370 has blocked the offender anyway. Have you listed your RfA yet, and I slept through it, or you're still in the making? -- Longhair 05:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Never mind. I read the above post. It's coming :) -- Longhair 05:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Nicole Kidman
I will stop reverting, but I will keep changing it to what it should be. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs).
 * Well getting your friends together to gang up on one person to get your views prevailed is virtually the same as reverting three times. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs).
 * lol - Sliat suggests typing it in as many times as he wants is not a revert, yet when more than one person might disagree with him it's a consipracy? (actually, it's not all that clear that they do diasgree in this case though) --Merbabu 07:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Plus Slf67 has edited it three times as well, so don't think I won't get him/her banned either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs).
 * You're more than welcome to try! --Steve 23:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

JPD's RfA
Thanks, Sarah, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. I hope you decide to accept your nomination soon, too! JPD (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Sarah...question and more...
Hello Sarah,

I am sorry for the loss of Steve Irwin. He was very popular with me and my family. This is a quite a loss. We are sad about this, and we will miss him.

I have a question. What pages do you suggest I work on to help Wikipedia with my limited skills at this time. I have noticed that the "pages needing attention" section is vast. It seems there is so much work to do. Is there a section for newbies to work on minor edits, etc., or a category with missing birth dates? I could search and add information like that. Any suggestions?

I am recovering, but I have to be patient. Thank you for asking about me.

Your doggie is cute. He has a look of innocence in his eyes. It makes him look like a puppy. I like him. KarateLadyKarateLady 04:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Sounds good...thank you, Sarah. Cheers to you too. KarateLady70.187.26.211 05:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 5th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

still kickin'
Thank you for the good tips Sarah. The random article idea sounds like fun.

I'm still chipping away at my articles. I am making progress, so the Karate Lady is still kickin'. Now, if only I could remember to sign in. I start working then realize I forgot to sign in. This darn old short-term memory. Cheers to you and the nice puppy too. KarateLadyKarateLady 02:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Your comments at Articles for deletion/William Rollo
Your comments at Articles for deletion/William Rollo were altered. I have tried to reintroduce their original sense, but could you please check them and make sure I haven't mangled thewm in some way? Thanks Mr Stephen 17:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Reverted vandalism by Rollonet @ Talk:William Rollo
I've reverted Rollonet's vandalism at Talk:William Rollo: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AWilliam_Rollo&diff=74340967&oldid=74183093 Jim Douglas 18:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Not even cookies? Perhaps we are spoiling our nurses here? A bare minimum when on call here is donuts, which usually get frowned at, as freshly-baked goods are preferred... I've been trying to usurp User:Samir for some time; he made an account in 2004 and never used it. Thanks for forwarding the pages and Ghoshi's message, but it looks like Ghoshi's disappeared. Take care -- Samir धर्म 17:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Sarah, first thanks for your edits at the STD template talk page. You were far better at communicating with a new contributor than I was (I got quite frustrated with him yesterday).

UTIs -> I agree with you the STD template. Like you say, the bulk of UTI's are not sexually transmitted. The most recent update with the CDC's report on STDs talks about urethritis and cervicitis (which are definitely primarily sexually transmitted) but not on UTI's per se. I agree with you that it should probably be removed.

Dangerous drugs -> It's hazy here. The official rule is that all opiates must be counted and signed by some mechanism. It used to be that all opiates were locked in a dangerous drug cupboard and were counted and countersigned (and it still is like that on the older wards). Now, on the newer wards, they have these infernal automated drug dispensing units that count and dispense all drugs removed. For these, opiates are dispensed just like any other drug, as every drug is counted by the system, and an "electronic signature" is sent to the pharmacy. Our nurses then pop the meds (including opiates) onto the trolleys for dispensing at their leisure.

Hope this helps -- Samir धर्म 18:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

UTI/STD template
i think the article is flawed then, allthough im sure UTIs are not exclusively trasmitted sexually, they can be. I watch talk sex with Dr. Sue Johannesen a lot on Oxygen and if a woman has a UTI and she has sex with a man without a laxtex barrier he will probably get a UTI as well. They can be transmitted sexually, this does not mean that it is only an STD, but rather that is can be transmitted sexually, i will look some info up and update the article. Any thoughts? I don't want to start en edit war by any means, i hope we con cooperate to find a suitable compromise.Qrc2006 22:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks sarah, hmm do you know of the UTI that are sexually transmitted, do they have articles? maybe the UTI page's intro could be updated to clarify this, and say some UTIs are STDs/STIs or can be, but not all are. ?Qrc2006 04:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA
I know you said you weren't ready earlier and Mets501 jumped the gun, but, now you've symbolically broken the 5000 edit mark, so I'm wondering if the listing is imminent...? Tyrenius 02:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

questions for you
Hello Sarah. Can you tell me the proper way, or format, for listing books on biography pages according to Wikipedia standards? I have been editing Richard Bach and other bios. There is a lot of work to do on here--for sure. I've been using your "random article technique" and it is fun.

I'm trying to make improvements to articles based on guidelines I have received from Tyrenius, plus I've been studying the manual of style. But I can't find how to list books. I'm sure it is written someplace, but I need new glasses, so my eyes are buggy.

Also, is there a guideline for making proper editing notes? I have noticed that people use the term "style edit" and I don't understand when or how to use that term. You always make good comments, so I would like to follow your example. Any tips?

I won't have time to check my talk page until tomorrow. So thank you in advance for you help. Double cheers to you and yours, KarateLadyKarateLady 03:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I've answered the books referencing bit. Tyrenius 06:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You've still got the other bits to do! :) Tyrenius 07:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA
I am looking forward to supporting -- I could !vote now and beat the nominator -- but you ought to take it down until you insert the answers to the questions. Otherwise you might start out with a "didn't bother to answer the questions" comment from someone, and you don't want that! Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You're right, my fault. I saw a reference to your RfA on Mets' talk page (I have pages I've posted to watchlisted), and I saw the link to your RfA and clicked on it, and it looked real and I assumed it was live. I almost even voted on it! Please disregard my comment, and feel free to delete or archive this thread so it doesn't confuse anyone when the RfA does start. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I stumbled to your RFA from Mets' page. Good luck, and you'll definitely have my support for helping me with Eddie back when. In fact, mind if I co-nom just to mention your tremendous help? :) – Chacor 03:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, I'm sure you'll pass overwhelmingly! :) – Chacor 04:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I supported now ... but since I am on an American schedule, I was supporter #42 instead of first as I would have been if I'd snuck in ahead of time. Congratulations in advance. Newyorkbrad 15:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA
Mr Mets, do you think you could please update the edit count in your nom on the RfA page? I've just gone over 5000 Many thanks, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, all done! Good luck when it goes live! — Mets 501  (talk) 02:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

You had better hurry up with that, Sarah. My support trigger finger is getting itchy :-) &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, well, glad to see you finally got round to it - I was going grey waiting to cast my vote ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose 09:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, now I'm intrigued - any particular colour?! Cheers, Ian Rose 12:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)  :P.S. Did reply to your note of 16 Aug but left it on my page...  IR

Signpost updated for September 11th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Added a question to your RFA.
Hi, I've added a question to your RFA. Though I'm sure you've already noticed. :-) Regards, Ben Aveling 07:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * So have I.-- Andeh 11:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I noticed I am reading now, thank you.-- Andeh 11:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Courage
Your RfA writeup mentions that you've been seeking the courage to stand. I'm glad to see you have, so that I could support, but if during the process you find you need some fortification, I've supplied some liquid courage. There's a brand of beer from the UK that would have been perfect as an image, but I couldn't source a free pic so this Irish beer will have to do. Be a "spitfire" if you need to be, and best wishes. ++Lar: t/c 14:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I've been informed (by one of your lurkers) that this is an English beer, not Irish, sorry for any confusion on that point. :) ++Lar: t/c 13:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry Sarah, that was me. It's a delicious Shepherd's Neame nutty ale. I'd be happy to buy you both a beer when your RfA is over! --Guinnog 13:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Man, you certainly are an efficient lurker, aren't you! :) I'll take you up on that next time we're in the same country... although I suspect perhaps Sarah's the one who you're really wanting to buy the round for??? :) I never turn down free beer. (although it's been my experience with the buying a round process, as practiced in the UK, that getting a round bought early on means only that you're in for more expense later, as later rounds tend to be bigger. Is it that way in Ireland too?) ++Lar: t/c 13:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, that can vary, as people drop out (occasionally quite literally!) of the round, it can get cheaper as well. It brings to mind our Scottish expression (for a stingy person) "First out of the taxi, last up to the bar"; not something I have ever been accused of (at least not to my face). I may be relocating to California at some point, although it is uncertain just now. Not such a great beer culture there as here or Ireland, but not as bad either as some folks here believe. Cheers! --Guinnog 13:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Sarah, I thank you for reverting vandalizm on my user page. However, such foolish action by someone is not going to affect me at all. Regards. --Bhadani 14:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Sarah
Thank you for the response, Sarah. I've been working hard to make improvements on here. Take care and BIG cheers to you! KarateLadyKarateLady 16:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

hmm
you were just mentioned in some rather deranged insult -- have you upset any Indian nationalists lately? I have no idea why else I should be confronted with the scandalous revelation that you are, in fact, my mother :) dab (&#5839;) 18:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

'bout time
lol... yes, reckon so. I'm not really interested in declaring my attributes, because I'm not that important. But I'll put something there, just empty on ideas right now. Mdoc7 04:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Adminification help needed?
How may I help you in becoming an admin, Sarah? &#9812; BADMIN &#9819; (&#2310;&#2323;&#9997;)  14:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * She's already doing a pretty good job herself, I must say (knock wood). Sarah, wish there were baked goods today, but I'm off studying for my Royal College exams next week (3 days of horror!) and have resorted to the Canadian staple Tim Hortons.  Take care -- Samir धर्म  07:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I must say, if support for your RfA keeps up, the Wikimedia Foundation will be needing an urgent fundraising drive to obtain more server space just to keep hold of all the support you've been given. Well done on a (soon to be) outstanding entry into the mop closet. -- Longhair 06:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

WorldPaperMoney website removed from Manx Pound article
Just wondering why you thought this was a 'spam site'... I'd not actually looked at it before you removed the link, but it doesn't have advertising, and seems to have some quite good reference images that are relevant to the article. 82.153.96.176 21:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Open Proxies

 * Hey Sarah, you just got in before my Wikibreak :). Yes, that's definetly true. Here's some references: (read the last dot point), (first sentence under Feb), (read first sentence),  (second paragraph). That should be enough to convince someone ;). But yeah, if you see something like Don'\t or Don\'t, report it to AIV immediately for indef blocking :) HTH.. Send me an email at <> (you know what to remove ;) ) if you need anything while I'm away. Bye! :) --D e on555<b style="color:purple;">talk</b>Review 22:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey Sarah, you just got in before my Wikibreak :). Yes, that's definetly true. Here's some references: (read the last dot point), (first sentence under Feb), (read first sentence),  (second paragraph). That should be enough to convince someone ;). But yeah, if you see something like Don'\t or Don\'t, report it to AIV immediately for indef blocking :) HTH.. Send me an email at <> (you know what to remove ;) ) if you need anything while I'm away. Bye! :) --D e on555<b style="color:purple;">talk</b>Review 22:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks you again Sarah
Sarah...thank you for the category fix. I realized what I did wrong when I looked at my talk page. You had helped me once before with category ideas and I forgot. :0 This poor old memory... KarateLadyKarateLady 03:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Sarah, thanks for the tip about cats. Well, I must sign off. We are in the middle or a horrendous storm and I must shut down the computer. Have a wiki time!:) Signing off, KarateLadyKarateLady 04:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Good Archiving
I was wondering what to do with all the useless talk with and about Returnoftheman on the Talk:Schizophrenia page. (You saw that he was blocked by Fred Bauder withing hours, I'm sure, so that's that - for the moment.) It also seemed too cluttered to me, partially of course by my own fault. But of course, selective archiving is the very best way - many thanks for doing that! Now one can focus on the page's content again. Thanks also for reverting the changes on my user page. Ebbinghaus 09:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA
Congratulations on your new mop and bucket! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 05:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
You're now an admin, so have fun using your new tools to help the project. Be conservative with them at first, and re-read the policies before acting, and as you get the hang of it, jump in and help clear out the backlogs. Again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 05:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, Sarah, very well deserved, .... and I must say I am relieved that you didn't overtake my tally....lol :) .Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 05:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Many congratulations on your adminship. No problem with the nomination. You deserve it. – Chacor 08:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats! Syrthiss 14:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
Well done on your admin status. Hope the negative comments didn't put you off. ps. Can I have the number of your "publicist" :-) --<font style="background: #CC9900" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF"> Funky Monkey  <font style="background:#CD00CD" face="Ariel" color="#FFFFFF"> (talk)  05:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Bah, you only just scraped through! (joke, for the humorously challenged) Very well done, and enjoy the new buttons! --Guinnog 09:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I guess it's my fault. I congratulated you not only early, but also in an unorthodox way (I didn't create a new section to avoid overcrowding your talk page). It was easily missed, but you discovered it all the same. If there's any advice I can give to newly crowned admins, it's to use your best judgement (it's gotten you this far, so keep it up), ask other admins whenever in doubt, and don't be afraid of making mistakes - we all do it. Welcome aboard. -- Longhair 10:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Congrats Sarah on such a successful RfA and have fun with your new tools! (and the power that comes with it :-) — Mets 501 (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * From me too. All the best with the new tools! :-) -- thund e rboltz<sup style="color:green;">(Deepu) 14:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Ditto!
Congratulations, Sarah! I didn't even realize you were up for nomination! (not that you needed my "Yes" vote) I'm so happy for you! I'll tell you the same thing I tell my kids all the time: "Do Good work..." But I know that you will. If'n you need just to holler at anyone, you know where to find me -- feel free. --Mhking 13:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations Sarah!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your work is outstanding. You deserve all you receive in life. Thank you for your patience with my newbieness, for your attention to details, and for your kind and thoughtful gestures. We are fortunate to have you on here. Best wishes, KarateLadyKarateLady 14:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello, Sarah. I've seen your name a lot on Wikipedia recent changes, and I wanted to congratulate you as well, especially before your talk page gets crowded. --Kyok o 14:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

PS...thank you for the archives on my talk page too. :) KarateLadyKarateLady 16:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Angela Beesley
Re: this, can I presume you'll be posting to talk soon? --Coroebus 15:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Since you have not explained your reasons for that revert on the talk page I have restored a version of it, User:The bainer has kindly explained his reasons for reverting but I do not think they are justified. --Coroebus 07:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Hi Sarah, congratulations and well done on your RfA. Sorry I missed it, when I finally rolled up to vote, it was already closed :-( ... my voice wasn't needed anyway. Good luck with the mop and bucket. All the best. -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  18:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Glad you liked the photos, they usually cheer me up when WikiRioting happens. See you around. Cheers. -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  19:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Well done!
The bribes can be paid off over time... ++Lar: t/c 20:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats!
Well done- A very deserved addition to the "executive team"!! And thanks for the additions to James Malton. I have tried to find his d.o.b. but maybe I will have to dig a bit deeper..

Downunda 21:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Merging categories
Hello - well done on your Adminship. I was wondering whether as an admin you would be able to help me - I'm trying to merge the categories Category:Towns in New South Wales and Category:Villages in New South Wales. There is no noticeable difference between these two and no criteria for establishing a place in one or the other. I have placed up a notice of merger for about a month and have had one positive reply and no objections. As far as I can see there's no way for a non-admin to merge categories - is that something you can do for me? Any help is appreciated. Thanks. (JROBBO 03:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC))

RfA congrats
I was asked a few weeks ago whether I would like to run for admin and well, I would never get my thesis done if I did now! Thanks for the compliment :) Cheers mate, Ans e ll  12:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Reply from Ian
My pleasure, Sarah, on all counts. Hearty congrats, you deserved every vote and more. I see you've been getting the odd tidbit of advice as well. My only 'suggestion' is: don't change a thing...! Cheers, Ian Rose 15:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
I congratulate you on your new role. All the best. --Bhadani 19:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I, for one, would also like to congratulate you and wish you luck with your well-deserved adminship. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 00:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

std sti template
no shit your in australia, that still boggles my mind how people from one continant and another just communicate and cooperate just like that. hmm. regarding the guy who's a doctor, do you know he's a doctor? have u met him? have you seen his credentials? im sure you havnt. alltho id lean towards believing him, just because he is a doctor doesnt mean he is a good one, or a knowledgeable one. furthermore this is wikipedia, and doctor editors dont get any more clout than i do, thats elitist and albeit the varying levels of unregistered contributer, casual reader only, editor, editor with more then 3000 edits, admin, owners etc its a pretty damn egalitarian place so i really dont care if hes a doctor or not, i care about verifiable truths and adding in whatever i like to. Qrc2006 11:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Your note
You're welcome, Sarah, and congratulations on the resounding support you got, which you thoroughly deserve. :-) SlimVirgin <sup style="color:purple;">(talk) 13:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh a surprise to see the SV here. So, I wish both the ladies all the best! Thank you Sarah for your note of confidence. However, the other person was entitled to his opinion! --Bhadani 13:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

More pile on Congrats'
Congrats’ on your advancement as admin! I have seen you around quite a bit (although I haven’t spoke on you talk page before). You are a great editor (I know, like you haven’t heard that before). Your promotion is well deserved. Cheers! JungleCat   talk / contrib  16:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Well done, but.. YOU MISSED A QUESTION! Oh dear!-- Andeh 21:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh my! What to do??? Tyrenius, please don't clobber me for saying this! It is now a piece of Wiki history. JungleCat    talk / contrib  22:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

User:65.31.100.170
You blocked the above for 48 hours. He's just come off a 2 week block for abuse and has gone on another spree of personal attacks. He is also User:Tonetare and our old friend User:TareTone. He seems unable to work harmoniously with others. I think at least a month block and preferably 6 months would be in order, as I can't see anything other than continued abuse from him. Tyrenius 21:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Just got email and replied. Tyrenius 21:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: RfA
You're welcome! Congratulations on becoming an admin! --Core des at talk! 21:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

quick question
Sarah, when listing books on bio pages, how do I list a book that has more than one ISBN number? For example, on the article Hal Higdon, he had a book published in 1975 but it was re-released in 1999. Now the same book has two different ISBN numbers. Which one do I use? KarateLadyKarateLady 22:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * My instinct is to go for the first edition, unless there is a particular reason to choose the later one or even both. Tyrenius 22:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay...
Thank you, Sarah. I agree, it could get long and complicated to list every edition. Hal Higdon wrote 34 books. I'm not sure I should all of them. That was another question too. I wonder if I should list all of the books I find? KarateLadyKarateLady 22:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it is an encyclopedia! List them... Tyrenius 22:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations
Welcome to the list of rouge admins. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 23:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Michael 02:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I second that. :) &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And I third it. (Or fourth it, I think?) The JPS <sup style="color:purple;">talk to me  16:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations & history removal
Cheers!! Many congratulations indeed. Its an amazing tally that you got :-) You certainly deserve it. And indeed, as you guessed, I had been wondering about removing the history and diffs leading back to my personal info of my user page. Could you kindly remove the history from there, so that no one can look back at that info again. Thanks and congratulations again :-) EyeMD 06:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I just edited my userpage (prolly after you left), so you can remove the rest of the history (including what the bot did) at your convenience. Am leaving town today evening for OPD & surgeries on Saturday. Be back at a later time. Thanks again :-) EyeMD 06:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Well done!
Well done Sarah Ewart in becoming an admin! Sorry, I thought Sarah Ewart was somebody I had dealt with in the past. I'm sorry for the remark, I believed it was Sarah Ewrt (a real life name). Once again, well done!
 * Thanks, you'll do a great job. Auroranorth 11:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Halo's RfA
<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #fff5f5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid darkgreen;">

Explanation for deletion?
Hello, I saw that the page for SysWiz LTD was deleted. I wonder, what are the measures used to decide whether certain companies get into wikipedia, and others not? Please explain, thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mottis (talk • contribs).

Congrats
Congratulations from me too :-) though I didn't get a thank you letter :-( DVD+ R/W 23:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understand, and thought it might have been because of the high voter turnout. Sorry for not being patient. Enjoy all the userpages. See ya around :-) DVD+ R/W 00:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy
CAN YOU PLEASE REMOVE THE SPEEDY DELETION OF THE ARTICLE I JUST POSTED? YOU DID NOT ALLOW ME AND OTHERS A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME TO RESPOND. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW TO REMOVE THIS NOTICE. THANK YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

MS EWART, IT IS OBVIOUS THAT YOU CAN DETERMINE THE ARTICLE I JUST SUBMITTED (AND YOU SPONTANEOUSLY DELETED) BASED ON MY USER NAME. I PREFER TO EMAIL OR CHAT "IM" ONLY THIS OPTION DOES NOT APPEAR TO EXIST ON WIKIPEDIA. PLEASE RECOVER THE ARTICLE YOU JUST DELETED IMMEDIATELY AND ALLOW MY COLLEAGUES AND I SEVERAL DAYS TO RESPOND TO YOUR COMMENTS AS WE FAMILARIZE OURSELVES WITH THE WIKIPEDIA EDITORIAL PROCESS. THANK YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs). THE TITLE IS STRAUS. PLEASE CHECK YOUR RECORDS AND REINSTATE THIS ARTICLE AT ONCE. THANK YOU.

IT WOULD BE MOST HELPFUL, ONCE YOU RESTORE THE ARTICLE, IF YOU ALSO EXPLAIN HOW TO REMOVE THE SPEEDY DELETION NOTICE AND ALLOCATE A FEW DAYS TIME TO RESPOND OR APPEAL THIS PROCESS. THANKS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

HELLO, HAVE YOU RECOVERED MY ARTICLE YET? I PREFER NOT TO SPEND ANOTHER 2 HOURS COMPOSING IT (WHICH PROBABLY TOOK 2 SECONDS TO DELETE). THANK YOU FOR ANY ASSISTANCE YOU CAN PROVIDE IN RESTORING THE ARTICLE AT ONCE.

CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOU DETERMINED "I have further concerns that sections of it appeared to be lifted from an external website"? WHICH WEBSITE? ALL SOURCES WERE CITED IN THE ARTICLE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

PER YOUR RESPONSE, I AM ASSOCIATED WITH THE WEBSITES. PLEASE RESTORE THE ARTICLE AND ALSO INDICATE HOW TO AVOID THESE SPEEDY DELETIONS SINCE ALL GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND INFORMATION CITED ARE LEGITIMATE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

IF I MUST REWRITE THE ARTICLE, I WOULD LIKE YOU AND THE THREE EDITORS YOU IDENTIFIED TO ASSURE ME THAT YOU WILL REFRAIN FROM DELETING THE ARTICLE AGAIN. IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THERE WAS SOME KIND OF MISUNDERSTANDING. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

I AM SORRY BUT I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO USE THE TALK FEATURE. YOU ARE WELCOME TO EMAIL ME THE COPY YOU IDENTIFIED (AND STEP-BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO USE THE TALK FEATURE. IS IT THE SAME AS A LIVE CHAT? THIS I DO NOT KNOW.)  I ASSURE YOU THAT THE COPYRIGHTS ARE ALL IN PLACE AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION CITED IS COMPLETELY LEGITIMATE. THANK YOU. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

Request for undeletion
I think the Robin Ball entry should be undeleted, as I describe in my talk page. It was nominated for speedy deletion, which I think is inappropriate: cf Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles: "Only those articles where there is no plausible assertion of importance should be considered for Wikipedia:Speedy deletion." I was advised to put a delrev tag on the page, but don't know how to access it. Delph4 16:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

You just deleted Challenge coin association. Typing the holdon tag was supposed to buy me some time to assert that this club is important in the talk page. I respectfully request you bring it back, as it is a valuable organization. --

Your explanation for deleting my article is understood. Any advice on what it would take to meet your criteria, since I must've been way off? --JAYMEDINC 02:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Rumbled
Yanksox found out. I thought you should know. See here also Tyrenius 01:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on your RfA
Sarah, a belated well done! Regards -- I@n 11:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Shhhh! ;) -- I@n 11:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Well deserved adminship. All the best. RedZebra 12:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Ditto the above. Feel free to come by if you ever need a hand. :-) --HappyCamper 16:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, hope you put your new powers to good use Jeffklib 02:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, Sarah! All the best with the new tools. &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc''' 16:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Cheers! I like the photo of your dog – mine don't sit still long enough to take photos. &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc 16:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC) I see you've already got some admirers! *down there* &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc 16:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Why was MATHOS deleted? I just bought a cd and added him on wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The8ball (talk • contribs).
 * More belated congrats!!! Well done!!  You'll do a fine job! -- Samir धर्म  22:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

anti-americanism in various...
I just thought if it was deleted then I could make a request for the article to be written again --Frogsprog 17:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

from Aeternus
You can delete everything in 'About me', even i'ts talk page. --Aeternus 17:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks --Aeternus 17:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

:o
Well Done! I can't believe the second I go off to camp you not only accept the nomination, but pass!, err I mean congratulations Sarah, no doubt you will use the tools extrememly well, and with utmost caution :). Well done Sarah. --D e on555<b style="color:purple;">talk</b>Review 23:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Sarah, thanks for the tip and deleting the comment on my page. I checked the history and sure enough the article's there. Cheers, and hopefully catch up with you again on Wikipedia in the future! Romtobbi 08:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Star for you
I award this barnstar to Sarah Ewart for organizing my user page, fixing styles and formats, and for performing random acts of kindness. Bravo! KarateLadyKarateLady 17:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Dupas expansion
Hi Sarah. A few weeks back you took an interest in the article on Peter Dupas. I've done a fair bit of work tonight and expanded on this monsters article. If you can stomach his life story, would you mind taking a quick glance and suggest where the article may be lacking if you have time? There's quite a lot to go, as his crimes cover a 30 year history, but I'm think I'm heading in the right direction. -- Longhair 13:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Tread carefully around the crimelibrary.com library article on Dupas. I've found them highly unreliable compared to more reliable sources such as news reports - crimelibrary.com tends to have information on Dupas I can't find anywhere else, and dates there are often incorrect. I've just found a heap more on Dupas, so perhaps leave that quick review for a few days. This character has a lot to answer for and it's going to take a while to get it all into the article. For the code on my aussie flag usage, view the content of User:Longhair/Header. Good to see your admin bit doing it's work also. I've been watching, and you're doing fine. -- Longhair 13:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I wonder then, do you have access to legal documents pre-1997? Austlii doesn't hold them for Victorian Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases. -- Longhair 13:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * That's it. I've had others give me older court documents before from Factiva. Thanks for the offer. I'll let you know about the keywords as I require the information. No use overloading :) -- Longhair 13:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I spent a good part of today on this article. I managed to source some documents on Dupas from the 70's and have now added a great deal of information on his earlier life and other uncharged crimes on women. Problem is, when you spend so much time looking at the one subject, things tend to blur into one big mess :/ Pick and pick away at my work if your time will allow. Another set of eyes is always a good thing. I think the article is about 85% complete for now. Dupas won't ever see the light of day again, so hopefully there won't be much more information to add apart from what I've already found and have here with me and his court appearances to come. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 12:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Fair point on the edit to "alleged". Thanks for your time. I've thrown it up for Peer review to see what others have to suggest. Good question on the signature link to. It'd be an interesting article. -- Longhair\talk 05:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR and vandalism reporting
I can live with your decision, thank you. Yet I would like to be advised what is the proper way to deal with such a situation, since all attempts have failed to address the other user in a civilized way. I would like to ask for mediation in this matter. --FordPrefect42 15:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Message
You're totally welcome. I just emailed you a cracker in return. --Guinnog 16:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Email for Junglecat
Hello there Sarah! Good to hear from you. I have an old email account that will change shortly. The old one I thought was activated (I think?) I will go into my prefs and see if I can get it to work. (I will update it with my new SBC provider email later on). I will get back with you. Thanks. JungleCat   talk / contrib  18:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think I have it enabled. I kept getting an error when I clicked the box and hit save. Also, I changed it to the new one after all. So, I should be good to go.  JungleCat    talk / contrib  18:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sarah for helping me with my email earlier. I just had to take a break for a bit. As you might have guessed, it wasn't active until today (but I thought it was). Best wishes to have the best day. JungleCat    talk / contrib  23:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

NYer
Hi Sarah. Please let me know if you were able to unlock the ability for us to revise and re-post the article we discussed earlier. It's been down for more than 12 hours and it would be of great use for others who rely on the information (for engineering and automation research) and us if we could please revise the article in accordance with your earlier suggestions. Thanks. (PS- I am definitely starting to learn how to use these Wiki-com features.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

Anti-Americanism?
It is not clear to me why you have created so much red tape over one short article. It appears as if you are intentionally complicating things. The subject I wrote about is published and very well known in the engineering field. She is identified on numerous webpages and websites. She has even worked with leaders of the transport bureaus in all of Australia. (Please review the first cited government report from the article you abruptly removed and locked if you have any questions.)  Wikipedia is an online Encyclopedia. There are numerous living and accomplished people from all over the world who are listed in Wikipedia. The subject of the article I submitted represents one of millions of these people. What is it about the subject that is causing problems for you and the team of administrators you have rounded up to review this... or maybe there are other elements that I need to now consider? Please let me know because your actions are truly inappropriate. I am trying to work with you, follow your suggestions, identify why the subject is important and noble, and yet you seem to escalate things without resolving them. If you now require the advice of your peers when you abruptly locked and deleted the article, then this demonstrates that you may not be qualified to be an administrator, let alone, a volunteer. In fact, it shows that you may have reacted too quickly and harshly in response to my earlier emails (in capital letters) and my lack of experience navigating the online communication of Wikipedia. The fact that you called upon an American and an engineer to further review my article demonstrates your concern about anti-Americanism because the subject is an American. This was not an issue until you raised it and allied with Guinnog. Should I now be concerned that you and your administrator friends will go on a speedy deletion spree and remove every one or more of my contributions that I volunteered and spent countless hours on? Will I now face bans or scrutiny on Wikepedia? These are legitimate concerns that warrant formal complaints. Furthermore, I am amazed by the camaraderie among the network of administrators. I am posting this complaint on your talk because I cannot seem to get one impartial administrator (who you have not teamed up with) to respond to my request for a complaint on my talk page. This is not what Wikipedia is about. Wikipedia is a wonderful tool. Please do not ruin it for the rest of us. I trust that you respect all people- including Americans-  who freely contribute to Wikipedia. We are *all* volunteers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NYer (talk • contribs).

Deleted article
People are allowed to repost speedy deletes. I suggest you take it to AfD and settle the matter there if the editor is that unhappy. Tyrenius 23:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Citizendium
Do ya think that Citizendium might cause people & users to leave wikipedia and join Citizendium. Oh yeah, and a long overdue congrats on your adminship! -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 00:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Mmmmm... I don't really believe in the project, wikipedia is more well known to users (and vandals for that matter), and isn't there something like IP's can't edit Citizendium? I think the project will flounder eventually. -- Lego@lost Rocks Collide! | 02:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

You went to school in the US?
I saw your note on ANI, and was impressed that you went to school in the US. I was born there :-). And now for something Wikipedia-related, while I'm here, congrats on the RfA. I was impressed by your (160?) personalised messages. I'm sure you'll be great with that bit. And now to return to reforming the process that made you an admin. &mdash; Werdna talk criticism 07:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Helping out with the backlog
Hi there and congratulations on your brand new sysop flag. Now that you are an admin, you might want to help the community in a way you weren't able to before. The obvious example is clearing out the Category:Administrative backlog :-) You might want to start with Requested moves which I find the easiest to deal with. You don't need to spend a lot of time there, if every admin (we have 1000 of us!) spent just 1 minute a day clearing backlogs, we'd have no backlogs at all! If you have any questions, just drop me a note! Enjoy! :-) --Dijxtra 14:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

question
Hi Sarah, I have a question about book formats on author pages. Please look at Erich Schiffmann's book section. It lists the date of the book immediately after his name, instead of after the title of the book. It looks like maybe this is something done by a bot. Should the date of the book be after the author's name or after the book title? Also, where do those codes come from? Should I be using those too because I have added lots of books, dates and isbns on different pages. KarateLadyKarateLady 22:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Sarah, Thank you. About the code, I probably used the wrong term...I meant the little formula that shows up on the edit pages sometimes. I just wondered if a bot does this or if I have to do it. It is confusing to me, so I will just keep adding the ISBNs and titles, etc. like I have been doing. Cheers to you :) KarateLadyKarateLady 14:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Your opinion on something
Hello, Sarah. I wanted your opinion on something. I was thinking on getting an article to possible FA status. I always cite ref’s, but I usually put the link only. A good example of FA I spotted is the recent FA article Hurricane Katrina that has references that have link brackets on the dates of eternal links. They put the date to show when the info was pulled from the website, which is good as the link may disappear one day. However, adding brackets to the date really doesn’t give you anything. As an example, compare ref 1 vs ref 2:

... helped in the effort.

References:

This section of the FA guide really doesn’t address it that well. I was thinking of leaving the dates without a link. What do you think?

Oh, BTW: I may send you an email on something I don’t want to post here (you just have to love what some users do). Plus I have been busy reading up on VandalProof so it may be a while before I send it. Cheers! JungleCat   talk / contrib  17:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks Sarah. I sent you an email. Hoping all is well... -  JungleCat    talk / contrib  12:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Xenon Green
Hi. Could you please clarify why you deleted this article? It did not match any of the speedy criteria which were assigned to it (as I discussed on its talk page). Did you disagee with this, or did you use some other criteria. Thanks Trevor Saline 08:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

stupid
Yes he did JBKramer called me stupid, here in an edit summary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qrc2006 (talk • contribs).

thank you very much, i hope this is just an understanding and nothing else, he just is very dissmissive when he does things. Yes, that one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qrc2006 (talk • contribs).

I thought
Oh. Sarah. I thought I was looking rather tired after 8 hours of journey. Thank you for your kind comments: Bhadani is distinguished and handsome looking:. --Bhadani 21:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Reference
 * Hi Sarah, just saw you during RC Patrol. It is early morning in India: Good morning! --Bhadani 00:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It is around 6.00 (morning) in India. In fact, Jimmy also felt the absence of women editors in the meet, and wished to see some women editors from India. I know (not personally though) of only one woman editor from India, Jishacj. In India, women are excelling in many fields, and school results show that girls, in many states, do better in school finals. I wish that more Indian women would start editing wikipedias. --Bhadani 00:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the good wishes Sarah! I'm pleased that all exams are now behind me! Take care -- Samir धर्म 04:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Patience
Well, your welcome, but actually thank you for all your hard work, I took the time to do more research (non-original of course) on Anderson and adding the info to the talk page while you were rewriting the article. And you did a great job! whoo! Thank you so much for taking the time to thank me though that was very nice of you.Qrc2006 05:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for reverting James Downey and removing my speedy tags. I forgot to check the history. Cheers :) MidgleyDJ 09:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The Age
Why do you keep removing the link to AgeWatch? A similar link from the Andrew Bolt page leads to a similar blog. Anonymous421

Blog does not need to be old to be relevant. If the blog becomes inactive or does not deal with Age related issues, then I agree it should be removed. Boltwatch was linked from the Andrew Bolt page since it was created. Anonymous421 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

You are also in danger of violating the three-revert rule, please discuss before removing links. Anonymous421 12:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Khosrow II making reverts
Dear Sarah, you are an administrator, right? I saw you blocked User:Khosrow II the other day because he was "revert-warring", and you told him to "make an effort to discuss your changes further". Well, he doesn't. Now he's revert-warring me, and he's not discussing. I'm a new contributor and I've been trying to make some improvements to one page, Greater and Lesser Tunbs, but he and two others have formed a tag-team erasing everything I write. They've together reverted me about nine times in three days. Each time I make different improvements, and today I made a big expansion of the article with lots of sources. Look at this,, I think nobody can claim that wasn't an improvement. Before I came the article was totally unsourced and most of it was factually wrong. But even that was reverted blindly without even a comment. They even erase factual corrections they don't even disagree with, just for the sake of not letting me edit. And all just because they can't stand seeing anything in the article that hints at there being other serious opinions than just their Iranian one.

Can you do something about this? They are wearing me down and I'm getting tired of having to discuss with these people, it's like talking against a wall. FellFairy 22:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Please restore SEDS
You recently speedy-deleted SEDS. I don't know what shape the article was in when you deleted it, but I think the organization itself is notable. Please take a quick look at http://wiki.seds.org/index.php/SEDS_History and http://www.seds.org/ The organization has a number of local chapters, and it's possible that the article may have given the impression that it operated only at a single campus. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)