User talk:Sarah Goldberg/Archive 1

Image tagging for Image:Woods 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Woods 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:2005 11 catherinewoods.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2005 11 catherinewoods.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. If you have not already done so please also include the source of the image; in most cases the website where you found it.

Please signify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Renata 14:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Catherine Woods
I've added the "prod" template to the article Catherine Woods, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Catherine Woods. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Yank sox  22:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not recreate "Catherine Woods." This article was deleted according to Wikipedia policy and community consensus. See Articles for deletion/Catherine Woods. If you would like to challenge this deletion, the only recourse is to Deletion review. All unauthorized reposts will be deleted, and may cause you to be blocked from editing. Postdlf 16:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Heligoland 18:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

New Orleans Saints
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kesac 01:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * You are blocked for one week. During this time, I suggest you cool off. DS 22:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Note
Please do not be abusive in your edit summaries. Thank you. DS 03:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Image:SWB3_temp.jpg
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eyu100(t 01:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Greetings, Catherine Woods. I took the picture in shallow water blackout to try to show people exactly what a victim of SWB looks like. Floating on the ceiling doesn't really convey the right image of what's happening. I appreciate your interest in the article but I would be really, really grateful if you could let it rest. Apart from anything else I am here in Dili, Timor Leste on an aid project and my internet bandwidth and access is extremely limited and unreliable. I am not able to cope with a lot of activity on my principal pages until I get back to Australia, it's about as much as I can do to download my watchlist and it's kind of stressful. I guess if the picture is going to get adjusted we'll just have to pull it but I think it's useful and it balances off the other one in deep water blackout. The picture is also there with the permission of the lady who helped me stage it, and I need to keep her happy that the image is being used as it was originally intended. Please help me to do that. Ex nihil 02:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Female homicides in Ciudad Juárez
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Fireice 02:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

You're a devout Jewish woman, I'm not
Catherine, please stop trying to get some vandalism into articles and talk pages. You've said from day one you're a devout Jewish woman, so why would you insist I'm a jew when I'm an episcopalian and you're a jew. Please do not alter this again. Thanks FoxSportsRadio 16:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Fine good for you, I am Christian. Does it matter, all it means is I'm actually gonna go somewhere after my death. Just so you know, my name is Eric Bannister, younger brother of Troy Bannister, who operates under numerous wikipedia names, and I contribute to many articles. FoxSportsRadio 12:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I generally contribute to my church, as a server. But I don't go every week. FoxSportsRadio 12:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Suad Husni
Sarah, quit vandalising the Suad Husni article, because it's getting extreme. FoxSportsRadio 12:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Murder scene.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Murder scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Murder scene 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Murder scene 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Atheist?
That was a Henny Youngman joke: "I used to be an atheist, but I gave it up: No holidays!" I am a generally non-practicing Protestant (i.e. not Catholic and generally not churchgoing), though I am known to fall back on the words of Jesus, i.e. to quote them when I agree with them. I am willing and interested to hear about others' religious views, or absence thereof, since I don't pretend to claim that my views, or the views of any religion, have any special monopoly on The Truth. I do claim to be a member of The Church of Baseball. That's another little joke, Annie's comment from Bull Durham. Wahkeenah 02:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Suad Husni
Hello,Well...Suad Husni is Egyptin actress from Syrian descent because her Family AL-BABA is well-known as Syrian-Arab.Although i don't have an evidance now. However i know that because I'm Arab and i just know it=p.....You can check on Google if you want.Thanx--Aziz1005 20:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Concerns...
Catherine, I'm actually a relation of the real Catherine Woods. I'm sorry about the confusion with your page. I've reverted it because it is your user information and not mine. However, since you've indicated that the username is indeed related to the real Catherine Woods, I would like you to know that I am disheartened by your inaccurate portrayal of her life. I would like to simply request that you modify your content and/or username to stop pretending to be my murdered family member. Since you are an avid contributer to this website, you probably already know how to change your username, but here's a tag anyway WP:CHU. Thank you in advance for your understanding. TrewthesSeraph 03:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Spaghetti Strap.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Spaghetti Strap.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Pascal.Tesson 03:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Either way, you have to stop using offensive edit summaries. Pascal.Tesson 13:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Spaghetti Straps
It seems quite jarring to me to illustrate a trivial item like spaghetti straps with a news photo from the Columbine massacre. Note though that that was the last of four concerns about the photo's use, which I listed in descending order. I would also add that the straps probably only marginally qualify as spaghetti straps, broadly defined. They aren't any narrower than standard bra straps, for example, and certainly aren't thin, round strands. I'm curious if you have a strong feeling about why this photo is better than the alternative. It really is not apparent to me, but I may be missing something. Thanks for dealing with that nonsense about men's clothing, by the way. Langrel 17:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The appropriateness of the photo aside, it fails the fair use criteria #1, which says "No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information." News agency photos rarely qualify as fair use, per Criteria #2, and certainly not for something as easy to reproduce as an image of spaghetti straps. Ytny (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Like I said, Sarah Goldberg, I'm sure they probably do technically qualify. I was just questioning why you would have a strong feeling that this image is an especially good one as compared to another. Anyway, that was more of an aside. Copyright is the more significant issue. Langrel 22:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

About Your Edit to one of my Subpages
Wikiman232 00:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about fair use.
 * How did you find my subpage?
 * You've been known to vandalize pages, so how do I know that your edit wasn't vandalism?

Unspecified source for Image:LACI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LACI.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LACI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LACI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Black People Image
If you can provide a rationale on the talk page then I'm sure your picture can stay in the article. But there are sufficient images in the article that illustrate the points covered by the text. Until then it's been removed. Please don't add it again. CJ 12:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

US African American girl in 2007.jpg
Hi, Sarah

Nice image, but I'm afraid it does not depict your typical St. Pete resident. Just my opinion, but I think this would be closer to the mark.

Say, you wouldn't be able to get one of Sue Stanton, would you. I'm afraid the current one will run into a copyright problem.

Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Othello front.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Othello front.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Othello_front.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Othello_front.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ichibani 08:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Murdered with acid.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Murdered with acid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:US_African_American_girl_in_2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:US_African_American_girl_in_2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:US_African_American_girl_in_2007_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:US_African_American_girl_in_2007_2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC)