User talk:Sarah crane

I'd love to hear from you! Just leave me a message. Sarah crane 17:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Energy: world resources and consumption
Could you please look at Energy: world resources and consumption and comment if it is ready to be a featured article? Thank you for your help. Frank van Mierlo 13:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Stubs
Hello, Thanks for your contributions. You may wish to know that it is preferable to use a stub template from WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using if you can.

Thanks, and I look forward to seeing more submissions for you in the future. -- Scot t  13:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Nice editing
It is nice to see how you are diligently working on articles. So many get into the community aspects of wikipedia, leaving each other messages and so forth, that some seem to forget about building the encyclopedia, But you have done the opposite, and I for one appreciate your efforts. NoSeptember 03:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

juan cole
i've been gone from that article for a little while and on my return saw a little balance. it must be due to your presence or maybe CSloat's not getting deleted as much or I caught the article on a non-delete day. thanx anyway. I gave up on the discussions after a while. It got to be an endless revert war. And I was outnumbered. So i just put in my changes, they got reverted and i watched the 3R rule. When i figure out how to do footnotes, i'm going to come back and add a Juan Cole's view on the new anti-semitesim ("NAS"). That's what the whole argument is about anyway. He has written a short article on that. Take Care! --Will 17:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Dropping by to say hi
Hi Sarah. I thought I'd drop by and see how you are doing. And, thanks again for your great contributions to wikipedia.
 * Regards, -- That Guy, From That Show! 20:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Archive talk page
Hi there, I'm dropping by your talk page because it's nearly your turn on the list for admin coaching, and just wanted to check that you were available for it. I noticed that with this edit you removed content from your talk page without archiving it. Whilst it isn't official policy I strongly recommend that you archive old messages rather than removing them (for several reasons, I'd be happy to explain if you want me to). Therefore, I suggest taking a look at How to archive a talk page. Feel free to ask me any further questions. Cheers, Petros471 20:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello. You said you thought I should "archive" old talk. Doesn't Wikipedia do this automatically? Thanks, Sarah crane 13:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Well sort of. All pages have a history (see the history tab at the top of each page). This is kept automatically, and in the case of your talk page it is quite easy to find where you removed old message (you used an edit summary, and the history is quite short). However, as your history gets longer it becomes very difficult for people to find old messages. An archive makes it much easier. Removing messages can also give the impression (often correctly) that the user is trying to hide things; in my experience the controversial users who get into trouble are often those who remove messages off talk pages. I'm not saying you are doing it for that reason, but it's best to set a good example :) Petros471 13:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Narcotics Anonymous article
No, no, no... thank *you* for your great work on it! I think you have improved it immensly, and am personally very grateful for the time you've put in to it. It reads much more like a fair, objective and factual encyclopedic entry thanks to your efforts. Cheers =)  fonetikli 23:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Admin coaching
The coaching program works best when the people involved are fairly active. As your contributions suggest you are more semi-active (not a bad thing!) then maybe it would be better if you just ask an experienced user for advice about anything in particular you might be wanting to know on a ad-hoc basis. You're very welcome to leave me questions on my talk page, and you mentioned some others- I'm sure they'd be happy to continue helping you. Cheers, Petros471 13:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Anatomical Terms
Sarah, many thanks for looking at these articles. You suggest that some of the three articles Anatomical terms of location, Anatomical terms of motion and Human anatomical terms should perhaps be merged. I have been actively involved with the first (which indeed was itself merged recently), and aware of the second, but did not know about the third until you suggested the merge.

In fact, User:Beth ohara's article (Human anatomical terms) is extremely recent. You suggest that it might be the "better written and more scholarly", but I am not certain this is the case. Beth's article as it stands contains several inaccurate points, and several more which are slightly incorrect. It (currently) bears the hallmarks of "single author syndrome". That said, most of what she writes is valuable and valid. The other articles may be less readable, but they are factually excellent.

My problem with anatomy is that my undergraduate soul is that of an anatomist (and comparative vertebrate anatomist), yet my current job is that of a clinician. Unfortunately, clinical terms of anatomy (used routinely by doctors in hospitals and clinics) often differ quite markedly from those of the strict anatomical text.

I am certain that Beth's article adds much to the (human/clinical) detail which I had attempted to put into the Anatomical terms of location article (with little success). I would have preferred that Beth had added her information to the two existing articles rather than starting from scratch.

Any merging of articles would need to take into account the requirement of an article to be useful for human anatomy, as well as comparative anatomy (see skull, especially its recent evolution, for a good example of how an article which was previously all human-oriented, has been (rightly) changed to include other species). Further, incorporation of clinical terms as well as dry anatomical terms would be helpful.

I think leaving the two earlier articles as they are and splitting Beth's article between them would be my preferred solution. (As of now, Beth's article is linked from fewer pages than the others). Perhaps better still would be to merge them all into one super "Anatomical terms" article.

I have cross-posted this to the talk page on Anatomical terms of location, and onto Beth's talk pages. I think there is plenty of good material here, and the potential for making things a lot better.

Best wishes, Preacherdoc 20:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Happy birthday, yo.  21 6 55  ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 17:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

-- S M S  Talk 18:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Effeminate_spider_monkey.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Effeminate_spider_monkey.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Na SYMBOL.PNG)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Na SYMBOL.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 04:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Na books.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Na books.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Directors of Deer & Company
I notice that this category is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Criteria for speedy deletion. I'm notifying you, the creator of the category, in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding to articles/categories that belong in it.

I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with db-author.

--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Directors of Merrill Lynch -- same story. --Stepheng3 (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Sarah crane! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Zeng Fanren -

Happy Birthday!
Happy Wikipedia Birthday! Wondering how many years it's been? :) Mokapantages (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philip Odeen


The article Philip Odeen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)