User talk:Sarah jason

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 21)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Sarah_jason/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Whispering was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 Whispering ( t ) 15:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sarah jason/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Sarah jason/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Whispering ( t ) 15:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Navia Lx


A tag has been placed on Draft:Navia Lx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx


A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. KH-1 (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx


A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MB 15:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navia Lx


A tag has been placed on Navia Lx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  18:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I strongly oppose lifting the block from the ✅ sockpuppet account,. Nor would it be appropriate to lift the block here, and no point in converting it to a ban. --Yamla (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

What is the use of Wikipedia if not giving it volunteers another one chance, especially those who did nothing wrong but got block because of someone else's action? I know administrators don't trust the IP adress from this location. That was why I strongly suggested my accounts to be banned or deactivate and give to other volunteers that did nothing wrong another chance.
 * It's the ludicruous "did nothing wrong" bit that keeps you blocked. --Yamla (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I do not know who is. I only created these accounts,  , Sultana Anya. Technical data makes it seem more likely that me and Rabbe Quiz are the same person because we are living in the same compound sharing the same WI-FI right now.

What I did in the past was preposterous. You have every rights to oppose my requests. I was a fool; I was stupid; I admit it and am begging you and the other administrators plus the Wikipedia community please not for me but for everyone that got block because of my foolishness. Give them another chance please, and deactivate or ban my accounts. Sarah jason (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)