User talk:Sarahami

Welcome!
Hello, Sarahami, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Australian Marketing Institute, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dog six (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Marketing Institute


A tag has been placed on Australian Marketing Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

help me
I have just created an article about the Australian Marketing Institute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Marketing_Institute based on another professional association's article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Institute_of_Management). Mine has been selected for speedy deletion. Why has the other one managed to survive since 2009? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahami (talk • contribs)
 * Hi, at the top of the article, the CSD template says: "This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. ... See CSD A7" That's a fairly clear-cut explanation. Editors who create articles must be sure to indicate how the article's subject is notable. Notability, for Wikipedia's purposes, is established by significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That is what we call the "General notability guideline." There are more specific criteria for companies, found at WP:NCORP. In the article you created, there was only one external link (to the primary source, a non-independent source.) The only reference you provided also originated at AMI. So the general notability guideline wasn't met, neither were the NCORP criteria, and that's probably why an editor nominated it for deletion. Don't worry though, if it gets deleted, you can place a request at WP:REFUND and ask to have the article moved back into your userspace so that you can work on it. I recommend that rather than submitting it as a live article, that you go through the Articles for Creation process. This is a slower process, but it allows for other editors to look at the article and make suggestions for how you can improve it before it goes live. The article really needs news articles, television coverage, multiple sources that independently talks about why the company is notable. Wikipedia is, after all, not a yellowpages. Hope that helps. Oh, and to answer your other question, as to why the other other article hadn't been deleted, my guess is it slipped through the cracks. It has exactly the same problems that this article had, i.e. no significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above answer is kinda long, so let me say the usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. The existence/non-existence of other articles is a non-factor.
 * I turned down the speedy deletion request because I'm unconvinced the mumbrella source wasn't sufficient to imply other sources may be out there. (Plus, I found two other book sources that looked significant).  I'm not convinced it would survive a deletion discussion now (but nor am I convinced it wouldn't).  Your first article is a good place to start reading.   If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers, Wily D  10:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)