User talk:Sarahbingham56

Pudendal nerve entrapment
You are edit warring and transgressing the wp:3RR rule on pudendal nerve entrapment. You are also inserting unsourced data while removing sourced data. Stop or an admin will block you. RxWatch (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pudendal nerve entrapment, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The page is protected to protect both you and the page - please have a look at some of the policies in the standard welcome template I will put after this note.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
I would like to know why my contributions to pudendal nerve entrapment were deemed as 'vandalism'? The article on vandalism on wikipedia states

''Even if misguided or ill-considered, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism. For example, although reinserting it despite multiple warnings can be disruptive, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article is not vandalism. However, edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism, but edit warring. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful thought may be needed to decide whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.''

Also when will I be able to edit the article on PNE? (````)


 * Generally, people will accuse you of vandalism if you delete cited (sourced) information from an article based on your personal opinion. If you disagree with something, then provide sources for the disagreement and go to the article's talk page to discuss the merits and reach a consensus with editors who may disagree with your take. RxWatch (talk) 04:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)