User talk:Sarahh317/sandbox

Wikipedia Edits Peer Review
In the description section I think there is a lot more the could be said about the other figures in the scene if you are looking for something to add. I believe that you added a bit of information about the cornicen in your sandbox edits which I definitely think is a great start. The Technique and style section mentions a lot about the depth of the relief which is very informative! There is one sentence at the end of the paragraph after the block quote about the perspective of the relief which I feel could be expanded on, since the perspective is quite interesting with no ground line and figures stacked on top of one another. I would also consider integrating Donald Strong argument into the article instead of quoting it directly since as a block quote it sort of breaks up the article awkwardly. In terms of the tone I think it is overall very objective and informative. The sources listed on the article currently also seem to be reliable. Keep up the good work!

Best, Justin

(Note: This Peer review is part of a class assignment)