User talk:Sarahjgrimm

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

E. P. Dutton
Please be aware that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a marketing resource. The historical publisher is much more notable than the contemporary Penguin imprint, so that is what the article should concentrate on the most. You should also be aware of our guideline on conflict of interest, as your edits give the impression that you are working on behalf of Penguin. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Janet Kaplan was accepted
 Janet Kaplan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! S Pat  talk 00:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.