User talk:Sarahmwb

August 2012
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Robert L. Smith (recording engineer) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sincerely -- Gareth Griffith-Jones  (talk) 23:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones
Hello Sarahmwb,

I thought this should be on your talk page for future referral ...


 * Robert L. Smith
 * Hi Gareth,
 * Thanks for your message.


 * I am trying to add external links to Robert L. Smith's wikipedia page so that people can easily view related articles on his work background.


 * I want his links to remain on his wikipedia page, so I am going to put them back now. My next step will be to interweave these external articles into a continuation of his wikipedia text.


 * I am open to any feedback or suggestions, if you have - -


 * Thanks!
 * Sarah Sarahmwb (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Good evening Sarah,


 * Thank you for contacting me. I re-visited the article and could see that you have undone my revision, which is fine.  You could put a template on it to indicate that you are working on it – ask me here for more on that, if you need it – then I'll know you've read this.


 * All the best, Sincerely -- Gareth Griffith-Jones  (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

-- Gareth Griffith-Jones (GG-J's Talk) 09:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy editing!

July 2013
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Robert L. Smith (recording engineer) because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. The Banner talk 19:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)