User talk:Saraik

Mindh
Mindh Tribeis basically from former Saraiki princely Sate Bahawalpur pakistan.They live in district R Y Khan & others City

Saraik District is in afghanistan province bayman, Its a Geographical name in Afghanistan. Saraik (talk) 09:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mindh
Hello Saraik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mindh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 17:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mindh
Hello Saraik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mindh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Saraik City map.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Saraik City map.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

what do u mean by tag ? its mean date ? I tag it, now ok for you sir. please help me how to use wikiPedia for better result .thanks

Speedy deletion nomination of Goods By Saraikies


A tag has been placed on Goods By Saraikies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Saraiki in Balochistan and sindh


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Saraiki in Balochistan and sindh. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Saraiki dialect. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Saraiki dialect. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Or Saraiki listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Or Saraiki. Since you had some involvement with the Or Saraiki redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Uanfala 17:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Saraik district moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Saraik district, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. IA (speak!) 20:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Saraik District in Afghanistan
Saraik District in afghanistan is Historically located in bayman province of Afghanistan. Saraik (talk) 09:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Uanfala. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Uanfala (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * These are SOURCE from National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Bethesda, MD, USA. whats kind of Source you want ? so kindly don't misguide people . Also don't genocide saraik people in Afghanistan in Saraik District.
 * 1-
 * 2-
 * 3-
 * 4- Saraik (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the sources. Source #2 appears to copy from the same database as source #1 (the Geonames one maintained by the ational Geospatial-Intelligence Agency); #3 and #4 can similarly be ignored as these are automatically generated pages, probably from the same database. The underlying database is often alright as a source, but it's not always watertight and should generally be avoided in favour of more reliable sources. But even then, the information available on the pages you've presented above allows us to only say that there's a place in Afghanistan called "Saraik" and that it's in Bamyan province. Those pages do not say that this is the same place as Sayghan. This information is available elsewhere though (, which is probably yet another interface to the same database, or ). Those two sources may be acceptable for the statement that Sayghan was formerly known as "Saraik" or "Sarayek".
 * One other point: the fact that the name of this place in Afghanistan is similar to the name of the Saraiki people 500 km away in Pakistan doesn't by itself mean much: it looks like a coincidental similarity. If you're going to connect the two, you need reliable sources that make that connection. – Uanfala (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The Saraik District is historical place in Afghanistan, the language spoken in kandhar is Saraiki known as kandhari dialect of Saraiki, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDv1Vtl7pEY
 * https://geographic.org/geographic_names/name.php?uni=-4822293&fid=154&c=afghanistan Saraik (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Hi Saraik! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Saraik District several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 05:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * SOURCE: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Bethesda, MD, USA
 * https://geographic.org/geographic_names/name.php?uni=-4822293&fid=154&c=afghanistan Saraik (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * SOURCE: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Bethesda, MD, USA
 * https://geographic.org/geographic_names/name.php?uni=-4822293&fid=154&c=afghanistan Saraik (talk) 09:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Saraik District shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   05:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * why you are misguiding the people about saraik in Afghanistan, Saraik (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. signed,Rosguill talk 06:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * kindly don't play to misguide the people. Saraik (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You need to engage with Wikipedia's consensus process. Discuss changes with other editors on the talk page once your block expires. Editors are going to expect you to provide sources that give more than geographic coordinates. Trying to force your version through by reverting is going to lead to longer blocks. signed,Rosguill talk 06:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. signed,Rosguill talk 19:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * you have misguide people about Saraik Area in Afghanistan. Saraik (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Saraik district
Hello, Saraik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saraik district, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Saraik district


Hello, Saraik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saraik district".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)