User talk:Saravanawiki99

Speedy deletion nomination of R.Balaji
Hello Saravanawiki99,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged R.Balaji for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, Saravanawiki99. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. I have changed some of the edits you've done to Kan Pesum Vaarthaigal as I'm afraid that they do not meet our neutrality and verifiability policies. First, the statement "this film was one of the flopbuster" did not belong in the plot section, so I have removed it along with the changes you made to it ("this film received critical acclaims from many magaziens except some "partiality" based magazines who were very hasty in writing reviews and are noted for their wrong reviews.") We could not move it to another section because there is no source to confirm that this is a prominent critical review. Likewise, while some of the language in the critical reception section was certainly heavily biased, you cannot criticize the critic -if a critic is notable, his or her review will be placed in the article neutrally. Readers may judge the accuracy for themselves. I did a search of the internet to see if I could find additional sources to expand reviews, but I didn't find any additional coverage. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)