User talk:Sarkarischeme03

July 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Alcaraz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 04:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

That's terrible writing, but fortunately that's not a criticism of your writing talents: the content was copied from this. Please don't do that anymore. Drmies (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I'm writing to you because your recent edits to the Wikipedia article on Carlos Alcaraz have been flagged as disruptive. Your edits have been reverted, and if you continue to make disruptive edits, you may lose your editing privileges.
 * Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, and we rely on editors to work together to create accurate and neutral content. Disruptive editing is any editing that interferes with the collaborative process, such as adding or removing content without consensus, or making personal attacks on other editors.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with them on the article's talk page. You can also read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page for more information on how to resolve disputes.
 * I understand that you may be frustrated with the current state of the Carlos Alcaraz article, but disruptive editing is not the way to address your concerns. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I encourage you to continue editing the article in a constructive and collaborative manner.
 * Thank you for your understanding.
 * Best regards, [Chaturgun Prasad Chandan]
 * I have also included the following in the message:
 * A link to Wikipedia's dispute resolution page.
 * A reminder to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * A call to continue editing the article in a constructive and collaborative manner.
 * I hope this is helpful. Sarkarischeme03 (talk) 00:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

11/7/23
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GraziePrego (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Euryalus (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Decline carried over--
 * I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)