User talk:Sarrena

October 2015
Hello, I'm Steel1943. An edit that you recently made to Template:Hatnote templates seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your edits to Erotic
Please do not convert longstanding redirects to disambiguation pages without first initiating a discussion and obtaining a consensus to do this. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Sarrena, to answer your question on my talk page, the disambiguation page that was sitting at erotic was effectively a dictionary definition, and that's against Wikipedia policy. The right place for this kind of content is Wiktionary. More philosophically, "erotic" is an adjective, and "eroticism" is the most directly corresponding noun, so there's no real reason to have different content in both of these places.

I hope this helps! If you still disagree, please discuss it at Talk:Eroticism. --Slashme (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sydney Skinny


A tag has been placed on The Sydney Skinny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thesydneyskinny.com.au/about/about-the-sydney-skinny-ocean-swim.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pixelization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Sourcing
Regarding this and this, for article content like that, Wikipedia goes by WP:Reliable sources, not the personal opinions of editors. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Still not sourced. If you would rather that I report you, we can do that. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Regarding this, nope, just someone who follows the rules. I will be reporting you soon. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Instead of addressing your tendency to add unsourced material, etc. at WP:ANI, I'm going to go ahead and note to you the following: Mosaic is not the same thing as pixelization. Yet you added this source to support your "or by arranging together small colored pieces or cells" wording. That source doesn't even state "cells." I'm taking this case to the WP:Original research noticeboard and will WP:Ping you there. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your edits
Hello. I'm here to tell you that your edit on Bruce Lee was reverted. I gave the reason in my edit summary: Lee was neither of Vietnamese ancestry, nor had a Vietnamese name. I also noticed that you did the same thing in multiple articles. As I have incipient knowledge of Hangul, I'm clear that many Chinese characters have Korean pronunciations, as well as Japanese pronunciation or Vietnamese pronunciation. If it's necessary to add his Vietnamese name, there should be Korean name, Japanese name...etc.. But I bet noun of them was used by him. As far as I'm concerned, your edit was not helpful. It was only trivial information. So, I think it will be better to verify your other edits. I don't know much about Chinese and Vietnamese language, so if you think my comment is incorrect, just feel free to go ahead. All the best, HiemstraTIME (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dairakudakan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold dust. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Pixelization shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 02:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Golden body painting dance show for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golden body painting dance show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Golden body painting dance show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jytdog (talk) 16:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MUGEN Entertainment
Hello Sarrena,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MUGEN Entertainment for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Amrita


A tag has been placed on The Amrita requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SunCrow (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Naked restaurants


A tag has been placed on Category:Naked restaurants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)