User talk:Sarrotrkux

Professional League of Legends competition
I've split the article if you want to expand it. Valoem  talk   contrib  03:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BMW 8 Series Concept 2017.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BMW 8 Series Concept 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EU LCS Logo 2015.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EU LCS Logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Aircraft carrier
You seem to think my follow-on edit summary was some sort of criticism or a challenge to a debate via dummy edit summaries. It wasn't. I was simply pointing out a fact, which you neglected to do in your summary (hence the reason I used the summary in the first place, it was just an observation, not an opening invite for a talk page discussion). Your summary after that is another matter; - wolf  01:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "The images I added specifically ARE international." - Why didn't you say so in the first place?
 * "The US is literally the most represented country on this page with 14 images before my edit, more than any other country." - It's also, by far, the largest Navy on the planet. Even the USCG is the 12th largest. It only makes sense that there are more quality images of the USN available than other navies. Doesn't mean that there must be more in the article. Just don't be surprised that it ended up like that.
 * "What is wrong with diversifying them with other countries' carriers?" - Nothing. So why try to hide it?


 * Well I do not understand why I would specifically need to add that I have chosen international images. I noticed in the section about the post-war period that images were not really chronologically ordered even though it would make sense to order them as such because the overall section is still about history. So I searched for images that would result in a more chronological order. I did not feel the need to justify what images I used because after all, when someone adds an image of a US carrier, do they need to justify it either? Personally I have never seen that. I was not surprised that the US was so heavily represented because that is often the case on Wikipedia, but it is something I personally try to avoid in my own edits when I see that this is the case in an article.


 * Then I added an image of the inside of a command bridge as the whole article was lacking any view from inside a carrier. That the Charles de Gaulle came up was mainly because it was one of the better pictures of such a view that I could find. Here again, I did not write why I picked a French carrier in the edit note because the main reason for adding the picture was not that I specifically wanted it to be French.


 * Sarrotrkux (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Like I said, why not just say so in the first place? If you think the USN is over-represented in the article, why not start a discussion about on it on the article talk page? Instead, it appears you were trying to surreptitiously address that with edits. But anyway, I was just asking about what appearred to be an inaccurate edit summary. After that, I think is the one you should have discussion with regarding content balance. Just, do it on a talk page, instead of through back-and-forth edit summaries. (And give WP:INDENT a read when you have a moment) -  wolf  20:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Well because the over-representation was not the main reason why I edited it. The reason for my edit was the order of images in the history section and the inside view of a carrier (the ladder I forgot to put in the edit note). I would not have changed any images if I did not see something else I could improve by doing so, and I only note down the main reason for editing an article to keep it concise, because that is how I typically see it being done by moderators.


 * Plus, I actually tried to get BilCat to use the talk page if he had an issue with my edit but he just continued with the dummy edits. I then talked to him on his talk page but he simply deleted my message and said I was a troll who could not count. Based on his user page, he seems to have some sort of personal issue with me having replaced a US image with another one (he seems very emotionally involved in US politics and its military usage) so I do not see the reason to have any discussion with him if he cannot bring any objective arguments to the table.


 * In any case, thanks for your suggestion, I will add why I chose different models as a side note in the future. Sarrotrkux (talk) 22:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Lol... yeah, ole' Bill can be pretty picky and surly about his userpage. If you read the huge list of disclaimers at the top, you'll see that he prefers discussions about articles to be kept to the article's talk page. Many editors here have that same preference (including me). You could try posting your comment on the Aircraft carrier talk page and WP:PINGing him. He's more to likely to respond (but it's not guaranteed), but he can't delete your post. At the very least, you can say you tried. However, you might end up starting a discussion with other editors on the subject, but who knows. Good luck -  wolf  22:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

US involvement in regime changes map
I was wondering if it would be better for the territory acquired by the US because of the Mexican-American war to be colored blue since the territory was acquired through war? Starsandwhales (talk) 15:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paris Saint-Germain eSports logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paris Saint-Germain eSports logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:G2 Esports Logo 2017.svg
Thanks for uploading File:G2 Esports Logo 2017.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Huawei article contribs
Thanks for your contributions to the Huawei article. They were appropriate for balance. Trying to keep the article neutral/balanced and thus not put too much in the criticism section on the main article. Please consider adding more details about what you added int the Criticism of Huawei article. Believe it fails to note a lot of details on the many controversies. --Ian Korman (talk) 10:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

HorseEyeBack is a staunch anti-China troll
I saw the edit you made on the "Uyghur Genocide" article and I strongly agree with you. The accusations are all alleged and there's undoubtedly lack of reputable, non-partisan, independent verification. The US was the first government to call it "genocide," on 19 Jan 2021 and many other countries are hesitant to use the term "genocide" based on allegations by very partisan groups/individuals. After HorseEye reverted your edits he wrote "horseshit," apparently because he's very sensitive to facts. I strongly suspect Mikehawk10 is his sockpuppet account. Stonksboi (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * In any case, his reversal of the edit doesn't have any viable reason, and it violates WP:ALLEGED since wrongdoing is asserted but undetermined by an independent investigation, yet the article had phrased it as fact. I reverted his seemingly malicious edit. Thanks for the notification! Sarrotrkux (talk) 12:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Uyghur genocide has an RFC
Uyghur genocide has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up! Sarrotrkux (talk) 02:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

"Capitalization (temporary)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Capitalization (temporary). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armin Laschet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic court. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Red Bulls (esports) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Bulls (esports), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Red Bulls (esports) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Bulls League of Legends Logo 2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:Red Bulls League of Legends Logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)