User talk:Sarsath3

Your edits to taxonomy templates
I hope it wasn't deliberate vandalism, but your edits to two taxonomy templates had messed up almost 600 other taxonomy templates before I managed to undo them (and there would have been many more problems when the servers caught up). (See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life.) Don't change taxonomy templates unless you are very sure you know what you are doing. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, it was a simple honest mistake. Sarsath3 (talk) 04:26, 17 December 2018 (CTZ)


 * Ok, fine. Do look at WP:Automated taxobox system; if you have any queries about taxonomy templates or automated taxoboxes, I'm always happy to help if you ask on my talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Ian.thomson (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Pleistocene megafauna
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Girth Summit  (blether) 17:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Categorization
I reverted your edit to Tremarctos floridanus, as pages normally should be placed in the lowest categories available, but not in any category that contains a category already used, and Category:Pleistocene bears is contained in Category:Pleistocene carnivorans. Please see WPSUBCAT. - Donald Albury 22:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad. Sarsath3 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Agriotherium hunting a Sivatherium.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Agriotherium hunting a Sivatherium.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you recently removed content from Magical thinking without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

It’s because as a religious person, I find it insulting to associate religion with magical thinking.

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 16:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

DS

 * --Jorm (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Shooting of Breonna Taylor, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Persecution of Christians, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Canaanite religion. Not just deleting sourced text but breaking text. Doug Weller  talk 08:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)