User talk:Saruiter

Nomination of Intergral Manager for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intergral Manager is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Intergral Manager until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 16:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Intergral Manager. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi
I hope you didn't take offence at my nomination for deletion. I meant no personal slight. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Well a bit, because there is no logical reason for nomination, and this article purelyndescipes one of the different kind of management styles there are. With deleting this it rather says that there are no different kind ofmmanagement styles. --S.A. de Ruiter 16:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing me to that --S.A. de Ruiter 17:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Intergral Manager. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Who is the one deciding in that case to remove the proposed eletion? --S.A. de Ruiter 17:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Click on the link to Articles for deletion for a description of the process that leads to a decision. AllyD (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

There is no disruptive editing, but a personal AfD as stated in the AfD discussion. Can't figure out why you are doing so....--83.163.167.28 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I've issued a first-stage warning about removing AfD notices to the above IP address. Please note WP:SOCKPUPPET. AllyD (talk) 21:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm also aware of a possible misuse of multiple accounts by this user, b ut  as they  don't  even understand the need to  sign  their posts, they may simply have genuinely forgotten to log in. There are however similar articles by another user up for AfD that have a similar history of recent removals of PROD and/or AfD templates. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)