User talk:Sarvagnya/Archive 13

Mohanatarangini
right. Lets wait for some more info. There are some links in the Rukmini page that can throw light.Dineshkannambadi 00:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rk2.jpg
Hello Sarvagnya, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rk2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sarvagnya/Annavru. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rk4.jpg
Hello Sarvagnya, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rk4.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sarvagnya/Annavru. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rk5.jpg
Hello Sarvagnya, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rk5.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Sarvagnya/Annavru. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note
Hi, Thanks for leaving me a note. First of all, if the edit in question has offended you or one of the other editors in any personal way, please accept my apologies. Having said that, I still can't understand what part of the edit is offensive. In any case, I have preceded all my edits with a discussion in the talk page, so if you have a differing source or feel that my edit isn't accurate in any way, it's better that you raise the concern in the talk page. Just reverting to an older edit, hardly tells me what's not right about my edit - which I'm sure you already knew, being the experienced user that you are. Needless to say, if you feel the article isn't accurate, feel free to make modifications. But a brief note in the talk page with pointers to your sources would go a long way in resolving the dispute. Anyway, I'm glad you took the time to drop by my page and say a few words.

BTW, on an unrelated note, I was reading a discussion elsewhere (on one of the talk pages, can't recollect which one), in which you've mentioned that your experience with your Tamil friends seemed to indicate that they carry an air of supremacy about themselves. I was surprised to see this note because that is precisely the feeling I got about a couple of Kannada friends that I interact with quite often. In fact, I was referred to this article by them - they used this write up as a source of arguing that it's been proven that Tamil literature is *only* 1000 years old. I'm glad they gave me the opportunity to participate in this discussion and set things right.

Cheers! Lotlil 13:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply to frivolous tag
Did you read the definition first?
 * "Removing all or significant parts of pages, or replacing entire established pages with one's own version without first gaining consensus. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary."

This is what the policy says. You removed large portion with verifiable references. That is according to this policy vandalism. So, in future before putting frivolous tags in my talk page, at least read the policy that you are referring to first. Praveen 17:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Edit summaries are not even mandatory. When explanations have been given at excruciating length on the talk pages, an edit summary is not even required.  Dont shoot your mouth off if you dont know the first thing about edit summaries.  Thanks.  Sarvagnya 17:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Unlike you, I have taken the excruciating effort in providing sensible reply to you with journal citations. I repeat once again; there was no consensus in talk page. You removed the content with verifiable references. It is vandalism according to wikipedia policy. You can refer to 'folks' if you want. Praveen 17:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No consensus? :) You're being funny.  If there is no consensus about mine, then there is no consensus about yours either.  And giving references from journals doesnt mean anything when what you write has nothing to do with what your 'journal' says.  And btw, this is NO journal.  Sarvagnya 17:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you accusing me of lying? Do you have the means and patience to cross-check my citations? Be clear. Praveen 19:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

 * How many times should I repeat? Do not vandalize my talk page with your frivolous tags. As earlier my reply is same as above. It is vandalism if you remove referenced portion. Praveen 19:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

good faith
i came over to your talk page to post a note that i had suggested the article - history of tamil nadu in good faith so that the confusion of period, coverage of the article in FA review is cleared. but having landed here, i saw all the user comments and i guess, i should not have been naive to think .. anyways., disclaimer: neither am i tamilian, nor kannadiga but i work with both tamilians and kannadigas and my comment on the article was in good faith only. Kalyan 18:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * you come to my talk page for the first time, take a look at comments(replies for most of which you wouldnt find on my talk page) about issues that you have no clue whats going on and yet, have no qualms in drawing inferences and conclusions about good faith, naivety etc., ... and then claim that you're doing what you're doing in good faith. and what was that about you're neither kannadiga nor tamil?  I didnt even ask you about that.  It really doesnt matter to me.  I cant see how you thought it'd matter to me if you've been assuming 'good faith' as you've claimed. Thanks.  Sarvagnya 18:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

RFC on Tamil language
This is formal notification for the RFC on Tamil Language to you. Here is the link. Praveen 20:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Mohanatarangini
Sarvagnya, you may want to change to "most voluminous literary writing" as "work" may confuse some readers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshkannambadi (talk • contribs)
 * Where? Sarvagnya 21:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

In the DYK.Dineshkannambadi 23:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)