User talk:Sarwan1300

Speedy deletion nomination of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas cheats


A tag has been placed on Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas cheats, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas cheats, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apart from the fact that this was clearly not the sort of content which is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopaedia, it was also copied from elsewhere, apparently in violation of copyright. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)