User talk:Sas27

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * For me, it appears constructive. This is not a vandalizm in case you cannot tell it apart from normal edit. This is opinion. You are heading the direction that does not look for me particularly attractive, and also I include the required guarding sentences (obvious lack of notability and hidden commercial interest) Sas27 (talk).


 * Apart from the fact that you are trying to completely restucture the page to impose your own view, your edit is also very poorly written, with most peculiar English grammar, with articles, verbs, etc omitted.}} JamesBWatson (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow! Sas27 (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Tommy! [ message ] 18:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, just tried to make clear for the Master JamesBWatson how I see him. Sas27 (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)