User talk:Sascha Noak

Possibly unfree File:Bhajans cd cover .jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bhajans cd cover .jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk  06:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ocean cd cover .jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ocean cd cover .jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk  06:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Shine Shine On
Hello, Sascha Noak, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Shine Shine On whether the article Shine Shine On should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Shine Shine On, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Epeefleche (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ocean (Devadas album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ocean (Devadas album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ocean (Devadas album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Milton's Glen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton's Glen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Milton's Glen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhajans (album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhajans (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bhajans (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Devadas (Andrew Labrecque) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devadas (Andrew Labrecque) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Devadas (Andrew Labrecque) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 01:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Devadas labrecque.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Devadas labrecque.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 23:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Yerou


The article John Yerou has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability; only claim of significance is that his company won an insignificant award (Mortgage Intelligence Awards)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iago Qnsi (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of John Yerou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Yerou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Yerou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iago Qnsi (talk) 23:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I did some work on the John Yerou article and moved content to the talk page that I could not find sources for. I see that much, if not all, of this information was in there with your original creation of the article. If you have reliable secondary sources that I missed, would you please respond to the discussion on Talk:John Yerou. I had wondered if you had a close connection, because I am not finding reliable sources for some of the content, but see that you've written on a number of other articles. Did you find that in bios about him? His website?Thanks!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 00:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1SEO.com


A tag has been placed on 1SEO.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Edwardx (talk) 19:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of John Yerou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Yerou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Yerou& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (Help!) 23:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)