User talk:Sasha Levine

Hi, there. I believe you are the editor that un-did the revision made to the closure section of the article about declining interest in women's college removing the additional source that was added. Anyway, I simply modified what was already there for clarity, after adding a new source (that might further explain the statement, and was current as of yesterday), without changing the intent of the statement, and to get rid of the glaring "source needed". Just wondered why you felt it was better to change it back. Thanks for any feedback, and if I've got wrong editor, please excuse me!

BTW, this was the reference that was deleted: http://www.dukechronicle.com/articles/2015/03/17/all-womens-colleges-face-challenges#.VQnnQ473-ix Mitzimorgan (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I never touched that section. -Sasha

Speedy deletion nomination of Dana Perfume Company


A tag has been placed on Dana Perfume Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexius08 (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Polly Sowell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polly Sowell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Polly Sowell& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply here 18:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)