User talk:Sashanka Singh

February 2024

 * The above does not make much sense, but please explain how you made a similar edit to other blocked sock puppets. Thanks. &#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Is 24 hours the duration you intended? &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Nope, that was by mistake. Will change to indef. utcursch &#124; talk 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

@&#45;- Deepfriedokra ~ The thing is that if I have read the previous edit of this page, I had seen the previous edit in it. So in one edit, there was a good explanation in the edit and the sources were also used historically and the main thing is that the sources used in this page are also there. And if many sources are telling from the inscription then it is historically correct, so I just did the right thing and added the other good sources that I found and also those of ASI. Apart from that, I did not do any misbehavior or voilent. I only want to correct the pages of Chandel and etc. dynasty historically. And I saw many edits of this user which is with the source, can I use that also? Can you please give me permission I promise I will not do all edit with sources and will not voilent any page like him.

Look, I understand that you have blocked him but if the source like Chandelas of Jejakabhukti by Vaidya etc, then has he used this also, will you deny it? Tell me yourself, if there is only one book and there is information in it, then that is the source and where to get it from? Similarly, he has used almost all of them, I have read a lot of them, I have used them so that the admin does not have any problem regarding the source.