User talk:SashiRolls/Archives/2016/September

September 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Jill Stein. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This is disruptive and such behavior needs to not be repeated. VQuakr (talk) 00:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * As you probably know, I'd corrected the edit by changing all 16 to a more descriptive name. Another editor chose a different name, before you commented.  I assumed the robot would fix the orphaned references as it has every time someone has reverted one of my edits because it did not fit their views on the page.  But your point is well taken.  Don't count on robots to do a job you can do with a search and replace.  SashiRolls (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement
Please see WP:AE. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * First response: I have a life and a job you know, and that job is not to edit Wikipedia.  I don't know what you're doing here.  Are you attacking me, or pointing through me at the original edit by Snoogannsnoogans where the 16 WaPo edits were chopped up, as described here and here?  You came to the Jill Stein thread on the 20th of August, with very pointed goals (vaccines, GMOs and pesticides interventions in the article) and lots of warnings about AE in the talk thread. Your edits are sometimes very very strange Tryptofish.   I like to assume good faith but this is pretty clearly trolling diff.  This is not supposed to be a page about gossip.  I will edit this as I have time to and add more diffs. SashiRolls (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Second response: filed.  I don't appreciate you using me in your wars against Arbcom.  This is you, right? --> wikipediocracy.com on Tryptofish

September 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Timothy Joseph Wood  10:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I have thoroughly explained your (recent) role in the snoog war (if there is an offensive against JS being led by snoog on her bio page, as I have long suspected) on the talk page, presenting you with argument concerning the content you wish to censor, including relevant citations concerning how experienced editors work around disagreement. On your talk page this morning it said you were a neo-liberal.  Admit you may not, therefore, be the most "knowledgeable source" as Wikipedia says about Jill Stein.  As I said there, I am open to debate, and find dodging debate highly suspicious behavior.


 * references Talk:Jill_Stein + Talk:Jill_Stein + diff of menacing thousand-year comment, which I chose to remove from my talk page. 14:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Active AfD
As I leave off editing the pages surrounding Jill Stein on the English Wikipedia, I would like to note that there is still an open "AfD" (that is to say: a call to delete an article) here. Neutrality initiated a call to delete the Political positions of Jill Stein page, and so far seven of eleven editors have agreed, including Tryptofish, Timothyjosephwood, MrX, E.M.Gregory, (who have all been so kind as to leave me comments above) and Snooganssnoogans (who has not). Independent, third parties who have never been involved on the page Jill Stein have voted 2-0 in favor of keeping the article so far.

The call for deletion of Jill Stein's political positions page is, again, here, whether you are for or against JS having a political positions page like the other three major candidates, you too can participate in making Wikipedia a better place (but perhaps not for long). SashiRolls (talk) 14:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced post
Hello,

I have reverted your post here to the talk page of our biographical article about Jimmy Wales. If you're looking to bring something to the attention of Jimbo, you should post on his user talk page, User talk:Jimbo Wales. Hope this helps. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks. :) SashiRolls (talk) 15:52, 24 September 2016 (UTC)